We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SINGLE

245

Comments

  • ronnies6 said:
    Your missing the point, my point is I should have the right to leave my remaining pot to my nominated person. Having contributed as everyone else. Yes times have changed so should that rule
    I think you are missing the point.

    You almost certainly don't have a "pot".  You have a promise to pay £x when in retirement so there isn't going to be a remaining pot.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ronnies6 said:
    Your missing the point, my point is I should have the right to leave my remaining pot to my nominated person. Having contributed as everyone else. Yes times have changed so should that rule
    Your employer bears the additional costs in the scheme. Employees themselves pay a fraction. 
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If your scheme is anything like mine then your beneficiary might be entitled to the refund of all your contributions.  Of course this may also be linked to a spousal rule, would need to check.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • Thankyou
  • Dox
    Dox Posts: 3,116 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    ronnies6 said:
    I have been employed for nearly 23 years and shocked to discover that should I die my pension lump sum can go to my nominated person but my pension goes back in to tbe pension pot. This is because I am single. I find this discrimitive and unexceptable
    You chose to join the scheme. The scheme booklet you will have been given (but doubtless chose not to read, along with most of the rest of the population!) must have included details of what happens when a scheme member dies, so you could have found this out 23 years ago - but what would you have done? Decided not to join the scheme in a fit of pique, thereby missing out on hugely valuable employer contributions? If you're so exercised about it all, you can always decide to opt out and transfer out.
  • Even for people who are married, in roughly 50% of cases there will be no spouse pension payable as the spouse will have died before the pensioner.
  • So the pension 'winner' is the married man who lives to 100, who has a wife 50 years younger, who also lives to 100!  :)
  • Welcome to cross subsidy, paid by single people the world over.     Just do a DB transfer when the time is right LOL
  • Andrew31 said:
    Welcome to cross subsidy, paid by single people the world over.     Just do a DB transfer when the time is right LOL
    I must admit, it does trouble me that in my view the basic state pension is below the threshold I believe a single person would require for a minimal standard of living, but if you double it for a couple then I would say this would allow a basic 'no frills' retirement. 
    Just glad that I have other pension provision and am not in that position. 
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.