Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Huge infrastructure projects coming, but zero housing, you had better buy now if that's your dream

Options
HS2, Northern spending spree(at last), local bus and reopened train routes, even talk of a bridge Scotland to NI. Boris is going for some real vanity projects that will be remembered in the future, who knows what he will come up with next, but I am mostly loving it. Nobody remembers grubby little affordable housing estates, and besides the UK has more bedrooms  than people as things stand, we don't need more homes but we do need a reality check where some also need to drop their sense of entitlement, and OK maybe more HMO types of property to help the homeless along with the counselling and in house support many of these people so badly need and deserve. And most of all the one thing this country must drop is the God given right to family housing just because you get pregnant multiple times while unemployed and by various unemployed men, if homes went to people with pay packets rather sob stories the majority of people crying housing crisis would stop complaining.
«1

Comments

  • triathlon said:
     And most of all the one thing this country must drop is the God given right to family housing just because you get pregnant multiple times while unemployed and by various unemployed men, if homes went to people with pay packets rather sob stories the majority of people crying housing crisis would stop complaining.
    Agreed, and seconded. About time we supported the battlers against adversity, not the feckless.
    “If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and who weren't so lazy.”
  • Do you not think a massive increase in social housing would improve the lives of a lot of people? 
  • Builders, councillors, developers, land owners... 

    That lot?

    Maybe.
    “If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and who weren't so lazy.”
  • Not sure if the majority of people bringing up problems with the affordability of housing are up the duff with their 5th kid by their 5th husband.

    A lot of people want that first step onto the ladder and that first step is commonly a 1 bedroom apartment.

    Ironically it's these 'affordable homes' that are making it harder for me to get onto the property ladder.

    Why.....because the 1 bed apartments I'd like as a starter home are either large, luxury builds in wealthy locations and priced at £350,000 each, or they are more modest apartments which are mostly put up as council housing under 'affordable rent' with the small remainder under 'shared ownership'.

    Where the heck are the modest new build 1 bedroom apartments sold on the open market at?

    Either you have got to be rich or poor to get a new build property in my area.


  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    homeless9 said:
    Not sure if the majority of people bringing up problems with the affordability of housing are up the duff with their 5th kid by their 5th husband.

    A lot of people want that first step onto the ladder and that first step is commonly a 1 bedroom apartment.

    Ironically it's these 'affordable homes' that are making it harder for me to get onto the property ladder.

    Why.....because the 1 bed apartments I'd like as a starter home are either large, luxury builds in wealthy locations and priced at £350,000 each, or they are more modest apartments which are mostly put up as council housing under 'affordable rent' with the small remainder under 'shared ownership'.

    Where the heck are the modest new build 1 bedroom apartments sold on the open market at?

    Either you have got to be rich or poor to get a new build property in my area.


    Have you looked at older housing in your area rather than just new builds?
  • homeless9
    homeless9 Posts: 375 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 18 February 2020 at 1:22PM
    lisyloo said:
    homeless9 said:
    Not sure if the majority of people bringing up problems with the affordability of housing are up the duff with their 5th kid by their 5th husband.

    A lot of people want that first step onto the ladder and that first step is commonly a 1 bedroom apartment.

    Ironically it's these 'affordable homes' that are making it harder for me to get onto the property ladder.

    Why.....because the 1 bed apartments I'd like as a starter home are either large, luxury builds in wealthy locations and priced at £350,000 each, or they are more modest apartments which are mostly put up as council housing under 'affordable rent' with the small remainder under 'shared ownership'.

    Where the heck are the modest new build 1 bedroom apartments sold on the open market at?

    Either you have got to be rich or poor to get a new build property in my area.


    Have you looked at older housing in your area rather than just new builds?

    Yes, older homes/apartments that I can afford are generally small and need updating. The more acceptable older builds are out of my price range.

    Newer builds interest me more as they are much more presentable outside and in and I can afford something I like via the Help To Buy Equity loan. My complaint is that they are not building any of the types of properties that I would buy and could afford to buy. Any new build apartment is either ridiculously expensive or given to the council to rent out.

    Is it too much to ask for even just one modest new build apartment to be built and sold on the open market.

    I just see old people's homes, council housing and high end luxury being built, where are the properties for people trying to get on the property ladder?

    homes for the dying
    homes for the rich
    homes for the poor

    no homes ideal for the first time buyer...

    ok there are some shared ownership properties, but it's better to avoid this scheme if you can.



  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes it too much to ask.
    We all compromised when we were young and didn’t usually get what we wanted straight away. The successful people moved up the ladder and got what they wanted a bit later.

    not getting anything at all is going to hurt you badly as you’ve said yourself you’ve missed out on circa £100k capital gains, not to mention the equity you could have bought by paying your own mortgage.
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,916 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    homeless9 said:

    Yes, older homes/apartments that I can afford are generally small and need updating. The more acceptable older builds are out of my price range.

    Newer builds interest me more as they are much more presentable outside and in and I can afford something I like via the Help To Buy Equity loan. My complaint is that they are not building any of the types of properties that I would buy and could afford to buy. Any new build apartment is either ridiculously expensive or given to the council to rent out.

    Is it too much to ask for even just one modest new build apartment to be built and sold on the open market.

    I just see old people's homes, council housing and high end luxury being built, where are the properties for people trying to get on the property ladder?

    homes for the dying
    homes for the rich
    homes for the poor

    no homes ideal for the first time buyer...

    ok there are some shared ownership properties, but it's better to avoid this scheme if you can.



    There's much more money in luxury housing than modest housing. Everything now seems to be tiny houses with 3 bedrooms and 3 WCs.
    The bigger problem is the developers who get permission on the basis that X% of the housing is "affordable", build the estates and forget to do the affordable ones, then don't even get fined for it.

    We really need someone to start building modest 2-4 bed houses / apartments for families, and modest 1-bed apartments for first time buyers, but if the government isn't going to do it and isn't going to force anyone else to do it, then it's just not going to happen.
    It's bizarre though, the government could easily build all the housing we need and draw a profit off it through rent. That's just a bit communist though.

  • Herzlos said:
    homeless9 said:

    Yes, older homes/apartments that I can afford are generally small and need updating. The more acceptable older builds are out of my price range.

    Newer builds interest me more as they are much more presentable outside and in and I can afford something I like via the Help To Buy Equity loan. My complaint is that they are not building any of the types of properties that I would buy and could afford to buy. Any new build apartment is either ridiculously expensive or given to the council to rent out.

    Is it too much to ask for even just one modest new build apartment to be built and sold on the open market.

    I just see old people's homes, council housing and high end luxury being built, where are the properties for people trying to get on the property ladder?

    homes for the dying
    homes for the rich
    homes for the poor

    no homes ideal for the first time buyer...

    ok there are some shared ownership properties, but it's better to avoid this scheme if you can.



    We really need someone to start building modest 2-4 bed houses / apartments for families, and modest 1-bed apartments for first time buyers, but if the government isn't going to do it and isn't going to force anyone else to do it, then it's just not going to happen.

    Developers aren't daft. Like any other business they're trying to fill demand and make a profit doing so. If the government are having to force people to do this against their will it should provide an indication that the government would hardly be making a profit if they decided to step in and do it themselves.

    Looking at developments near me I just assume people are looking for houses with as many bathrooms as bedrooms and enjoy small gardens and the opportunity to argue with their neighbours about the lack of parking from day one. 
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 19 February 2020 at 6:26PM
    Herzlos said:
    homeless9 said:

    Yes, older homes/apartments that I can afford are generally small and need updating. The more acceptable older builds are out of my price range.

    Newer builds interest me more as they are much more presentable outside and in and I can afford something I like via the Help To Buy Equity loan. My complaint is that they are not building any of the types of properties that I would buy and could afford to buy. Any new build apartment is either ridiculously expensive or given to the council to rent out.

    Is it too much to ask for even just one modest new build apartment to be built and sold on the open market.

    I just see old people's homes, council housing and high end luxury being built, where are the properties for people trying to get on the property ladder?

    homes for the dying
    homes for the rich
    homes for the poor

    no homes ideal for the first time buyer...

    ok there are some shared ownership properties, but it's better to avoid this scheme if you can.




    It's bizarre though, the government could easily build all the housing we need and draw a profit off it through rent. That's just a bit communist though.

    How does the Government easily build all the houses that we need?  Governments aren't house builders. 
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.