We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can I take £12,500 from DC pension without taking tax free lump sum?

I will be 58 next week. I have a deferred DB pension of £16k pa before tax which starts when I am 60. I also have a DC pension pot of about £160k. We are living happily on savings and my wife's pension so don't need to dip into my DC pension at this stage. I am not working so will have no taxable earnings in the tax year which commences in April this year. I don't need to take the 25% tax free lump sum from my DC pot.

Can I take £12,500 from my DC pot (and put it in my S&S ISA) without touching the 25% TFLS?

I thought not but I have come across an article online which suggests it is possible to take cash from a DC put whilst leaving the TFLS untouched. Here is an excerpt, I have underlined the relevant bit.

"Flexi-access is almost always the preferred solution because it allows a very high degree of flexibility about the way you can draw your pension. You can draw some or all of the tax-free pension commencement lump sum without drawing the income at the same time, you can draw some or all the income without taking the PCLS or you can take some of each."

Have I misunderstood?

Thanks folks.

Comments

  • wjr4
    wjr4 Posts: 1,328 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You must take tax feee cash if taking an income as you have to ‘crystallise’ part of your pension.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and should not be seen as financial advice.
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    If you want to make full use of the £12,500 tax allowance you would need to take £16,667 out. 25% of which would be tax free and the other £12,500 would also be tax free using your annual allowance.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    I will be 58 next week. I have a deferred DB pension of £16k pa before tax which starts when I am 60. I also have a DC pension pot of about £160k. We are living happily on savings and my wife's pension so don't need to dip into my DC pension at this stage. I am not working so will have no taxable earnings in the tax year which commences in April this year. I don't need to take the 25% tax free lump sum from my DC pot.

    Can I take £12,500 from my DC pot (and put it in my S&S ISA) without touching the 25% TFLS?

    I thought not but I have come across an article online which suggests it is possible to take cash from a DC put whilst leaving the TFLS untouched. Here is an excerpt, I have underlined the relevant bit.

    "Flexi-access is almost always the preferred solution because it allows a very high degree of flexibility about the way you can draw your pension. You can draw some or all of the tax-free pension commencement lump sum without drawing the income at the same time, you can draw some or all the income without taking the PCLS or you can take some of each."

    Have I misunderstood?

    Thanks folks.


    The underlined quote is wrong. Where did it come from? I have Googled parts of it and failed to find any reference.


    The PCLS cannot be taken after the corresponding taxable drawdown.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,276 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    you can draw some or all the income without taking the FULL PCLS

    I think what this should say is above .

    For example your DC pot of £160K , your full tax free 25% = £40K
    You could take £10K tax free and £30K would be crystallised that could be taken as taxable income .
    You can do this via flexi drawdown , in which case you could leave the £30K alone and just take the £10K tax free , or take all or part of the £30K as taxable income.
    Or you can take a UFPLS payment of £40K , of which £10K would be tax free and £30K taxable.
    The two methods look similar but they are not the same.
  • Linton wrote: »
    The underlined quote is wrong. Where did it come from? I have Googled parts of it and failed to find any reference.

    Thanks for your reply, here's the link.

    https://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/opinion/ufpls-vs-drawdown/

    I appreciate all of your replies.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,276 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    you can draw some or all the income without taking the PCLS
    It's badly worded and out of context.

    What it means is that once you have taken part of the tax free sum , you can then later take income from the crystallised part without necessarily taking any more tax free money at the same time .
    As I explained in my previous post .
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    you can draw some or all the income without taking the PCLS
    add "at the same time, because you already took it".

    Just use UFPLS and accept the tax free bit as part of the mixture. It's inflexible but seems to fit your need.

    Strictly, when not using UFPLS you can pick from 0% to 25% tax free lump sum. You can't take the unused tax free part later. This is most likely to apply to someone over the lifetime allowance who isn't entitled to a tax free part.
  • jamesd wrote: »
    add "at the same time, because you already took it".

    Just use UFPLS and accept the tax free bit as part of the mixture. It's inflexible but seems to fit your need.

    Strictly, when not using UFPLS you can pick from 0% to 25% tax free lump sum. You can't take the unused tax free part later. This is most likely to apply to someone over the lifetime allowance who isn't entitled to a tax free part.


    or someone who is certain to be an IHT payer at death and doesn't need to draw on the capital in their DC SIPP but can drawdown the investment growth as a basic rate tax payer for whom it would be more tax-efficient to crystallize their DC pot without taking a Tax-free lump sum (which would save 20% income tax but then be liable for 40% IHT on death).
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.