Free Daily Cashback from sites - Q&A Board

p_larkin99

bristolleedsfan wrote: »

I wasnt implying that you were. You have always been complimentary to me and I dont ever forget that. It should be noted that others within MSE have posted about Zee Sweets allegedly having been banned from posting on MSE hence the confusion when we see Sohail posting and other have questioned the level of paid google clicks that have been offered to MSE members.

You better not forget it mate!!!

Yeah i have seen a lot about the inability of Zee to post in their current capacity and cannot understand it. Also, the google clicks thing is also something that i struggle to understand. But, those clicks go straight to pending (hence tracked) and we've been told that as long as we comply with the terms, i.e. click through to the retailer or add, then we will be paid so i wont complain.


One thing I must say is that this thread is being totally derailed.

Can we have a dedicated zee thread on here so anyone who wants to post SPECIFICALLY on zee can do so and anyone who doesnt like the place can subsequently avoid it? I dunno, it may help?

bristolleedsfan

p_larkin99 wrote: »

One thing I must say is that this thread is being totally derailed.

QUOTE]

If you look back through the thread you will see that I wasnt the first person to post about Zee Sweets today I merely responded to the post made which is what normally happens on Internet Forums.

bristolleedsfan

p_larkin99 wrote: »

And I really hate it when people get involved in legal concerns (applies to all parties involved) when its something far too complex for most people to comprehend!

Owners of companies should do so otherwise in the words of another MSE poster tonight things look "amateurish".

p_larkin99

bristolleedsfan wrote: »

p_larkin99 wrote: »

One thing I must say is that this thread is being totally derailed.

QUOTE]

If you look back through the thread you will see that I wasnt the first person to post about Zee Sweets today I merely responded to the post made which is what normally happens on Internet Forums.

the derailed was aimed at me more than anyone else tbh!

ZeeSweets

bristolleedsfan wrote: »

I wasnt implying that you were. You have always been complimentary to me and I dont ever forget that.

It should be noted that others within MSE have posted about Zee Sweets allegedly having been banned from posting on MSE ( before I mentioned it ) hence the when we see Sohail posting and other have questioned the level of paid google clicks that have been offered to MSE members again before I mentioned it. ( Is there something wrong with me mentioning something that others have already posted about ??????????? )

Now everything us out in the open perhaps Zee Sweets will answer as to why they are encouraging Merchant abuse, thats the reason + the free sweet handouts why they are getting so much support on this Sub-Forum.

http://www.zeesweets.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=556

( Ill stand by for the fresh attacks from those who enjoy free sweets and merchant abuse )


http://www.zeesweets.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=9646#post9646

False insinuations again
on Zee Sweets forum against someone who again was unable to have right to reply, facinating those who want it to appear that they know so much when in fact they know very little...................

Hey bristolleedsfan,

I would like to say thanks for bringing the requirment to my attention, I will be looking into it. As you might be aware I am new on the Cashback scene but have been a Affiliate with many companies for many years.

R.E: Merchant Abuse.

We loook after our merchants a number of ways. This includes a fraud prevention system, which we have put in place.

The Free Sweets are really just a little way to make new users feel welcome. I give them out sometimes as it will show that our site is here to stay.

I understand fully bristolleedsfan, I know your thinking "how the hell!". Its simple. If you look at it at our point of view you would get it. We have (Soon to be) office in the states.

One of the many thing other sites do is, they stick to just networks. WE are diffrent. Many of our advertisers are tracked by our own systems, so we can get more retailers.

I like every human needs to vent. The way I do it is by posting on my forum. I was a angry at the service/Company. Not the people behind it. I am sure Maya and others running it are the nicest people in the world.

I hope there has been no hard feelings, And I hope my reply was not to harsh.

Kindest Regards,

Sohail

bristolleedsfan

Ashclix_company_representative wrote: »

. I am sure Maya and others running it are the nicest people in the world.


Kindest Regards,

Sohail

Firstly thanks for your responses today they were open and objective. :T
Hope you have noted that following your earlier post today i didnt post again until I was invited to by others.

Secondly : Why on your forum did you refer to Maya as "Mrs Rpoints Manager" ( What has Maya got to do with you ?????????)

Another Cashback Site has informed me it it has been posted on your Forum that Maya was sacked from Rpoints. ( which is untrue) Im merely quoting what was said to me by a completely different Cashback site.



Finally : You call this looking after your merchants do you :huh: :huh: :huh:


http://www.zeesweets.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=556

Yesterday, 09:13 PM
Sohail
Zee Sweets Team Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,415
Thanks: 321
Thanked 1,018 Times in 745 Posts



Quote:
Originally Posted by Princessx
Lol they arn't? So you can do each as many times as you want?



Yep but SHHHHHH.
__________________


Need help? Email me [EMAIL="sohail@ashgb.eu"]sohail@ashgb.eu[/EMAIL] I will try and help with your Zee Sweets issues!

ZeeSweets

bristolleedsfan wrote: »

Firstly thanks for your responses today they were open and objective. :T
Hope you have noted that following your earlier post today i didnt post again until I was invited to by others.

Secondly : Why on your forum did you refer to Maya as "Mrs Rpoints Manager" ( What has Maya got to do with you ?????????)

Another Cashback Site has informed me it it has been posted on your Forum that Maya was sacked from Rpoints. ( which is untrue) Im merely quoting what was said to me by a completely different Cashback site.

I like many people need to have a laugh sometimes. And on them days maybe she was in my head and the heat of the whole "member protect" got to my head.

I would like to apologies to Maya (If she is reading this). But I hope she got the funny side to it and at least see it from my point of view.

If a site thats better established then yours came out with sometime similar to yours (Even not exact) then wouldn't you get even a tiny winy bit annoyed?

I must say my younger side does sometime show, but I can't stop living .

I am glad you did reply, I wanted to clear the air it was getting to me!

If you would go to my other post:

http://www.zeesweets.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=578

You would note that we have a system in place to make sure that they don't sign up more than once. I will post there that it was a JOKE if it is bothering you THAT much.

Sohail

P.S. We have hijacked this thread enough To ask more questions etc please feel free to start a thread on our forum.

Daps

Forgive my potentially lame attempt to get this discussion back to maximizing our daily click earnings...

I'm going to have very limited internet time for the next two weeks, but now that Offerad, etc. have come onto the scene resulting in the potential to get a lot of money from pretty quick and easy clicks, I feel like I can't just abandon cashback entirely for two weeks... so I have trained my little brother how to do the Offerad clicks so that he can do them in my absence.

Thankfully he has agreed or I don't know what I'd have done!

Does anyone else worry a bit when they'll be away from the computer all day and not able to do the clicks? Anyone else come up with any ways around this?

ahai1

I have been a member since late August so it is a bit unfair to ask how much I have been paid as cashback takes sometime to come through as you know. I have got 131 points confirmed so far but with time I will get more confirmed.

You should at least give a cashback site a few months. I got paid from cashbackxtreme and getpoundsback after a few months as it takes sometime to confirm.

I hope that some of the members here can resolve their differences and agree to disagree it is not worth getting into an arguement over a cashback site and all excited on both sides as it achieves nothing and it turns the thread into a nasty place.

All sides should try and be civil to each other.

Sowhat2009 wrote: »

Please tell us how long you have been a member of Zee Sweets and how much you have actually been paid, not in sweets and not pending or confirmed, Whats actually been paid to you in Pounds and Pence please. :beer:

speedy_gonzalez_3

Hi

I just can't believe how blind most of you are! Just take TWO minutes of your valuable time you spend on clicking and THINK (please).

Zeesweets pay for clicking on Google ads and Google searches and claim they have an agreement with Google. Why would Google go for an agreement with someone who undermines credibility of their milky cow (adwords)? According to estimated stats (i.e. Link: mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/05/how-many-searches-has-google-done/) there were 2 billion in 2008 (that's 2,000,000,000) searches EVERY BLOODY DAY made using Google. Why would they enter into a special agreement with someone who VIOLATES adsense T&Cs (see below) for aditional what - 10k worth of searches a month??? (~350/day??). And send them an email about "conversion rate" less than 100%??? :rotfl::rotfl:
"Conversion rate" of >50% is about 25 times higher than what anyone would expect. But you just see that 2p or something and click these ads like monkeys (apologies but a monkey would have realized that 2+2 is not 4 in this case).

There is no agreement, zeesweets signed up to Google Adsense and CONSTANTLY VIOLATE THEIR T&Cs BY INCENTIVISING CLICKING ON THEIR ADS!
Google WILL find out sooner or later, ban them from their programme and revoke all unpaid commission. Will zeesweets pay you out of their pocket?

Also, they claim they have special agreements with number of merchants (i.e. HSBC or A&L saving programmes etc.). These merchants DO NOT allow incentive sites into their programme. COME ON YOU GUYS, Quidco, TopCashback, CBK have tens of thousands of members - would HSBC etc. enter into an "agreement" with a website which has questionable promoting methods and <1k members or would they approach established businesses with experience and credibility in cashback world?
As BLF quoted earlier, they encourage people to register with free registration merchants number of times. They WILL BE banned (again) from Affiliate Future and other networks and commission will not be paid. Simple as that. Will they pay out of their pockets?

Thanks for reading this. You can start saying all your stuff about how good and rewarding this website is. But just THINK for a moment - please. If it all was so sweet - wouldn't other sites do something similar ages ago? I just want you to save another hour or two of doing searches on Google which are FRAUDULENT and eventually will not be paid.


Google AdSense Program Policies:
Link: google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182

Section
Encouraging Clicks:
Publishers may not ask others to click their ads or use deceptive implementation methods to obtain clicks. This includes, but is not limited to, offering compensation to users for viewing ads or performing searches, promising to raise money for third parties for such behavior or placing images next to individual ads.
In order to ensure a good experience for users and advertisers, publishers participating in the AdSense program may not:

* Compensate users for viewing ads or performing searches, or promise compensation to a third party for such behavior.
* Encourage users to click the Google ads using phrases such as "click the ads", "support us", "visit these links" or other similar language.
* Direct user attention to the ads using arrows or other graphical gimmicks.
* Place misleading images alongside individual ads.
* Place ads in a floating box script.
* Format ads so that they become indistinguishable from other content on that page.
* Format site content so that it is difficult to distinguish it from ads.
* Place misleading labels above Google ad units. For instance, ads may be labelled "Sponsored Links" or "Advertisements", but not "Favourite Sites" or "Today's Top Offers".