Trainline.com - Incorrect Train Information Complaint

NBLondon

yorkie2 wrote: »

There is no point engaging in a circular argument; the ticket was valid on appropriate Northern services.

I'm telling you that a Northern service that connected into the revised timing of the LNER train is an appropriate service.

That's an example of an appropriate service - the same one I initially suggested. Not a definition of appropriate. I'm asking when a service might become inappropriate.

If you don't want to believe me that the OP's ticket was valid on such services, that is your choice, but I have no interest in arguing with you further.

Since that's not what I'm saying - the absence of argument from you is welcome.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/part/2/enacted?view=plain

"If a term in a consumer contract, or a consumer notice, could have different meanings, the meaning that is most favourable to the consumer is to prevail."

Thank you. An actual answer to a question.

NBLondon

Kiko4564 wrote: »

It is up to the OP what they wish to do.

Thank you, Captain Obvious