We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

DB Scheme With Restricted Salary Increases

cloud_dog
cloud_dog Posts: 6,417 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
Hi

(thought I may have enquired about this previously but couldn't find a thread from me with it in so...)

I have a DB scheme which I am currently an active member. A while ago the company decided to keep the scheme running for existing members but have limited any ongoing salary increases (pensionable pay) to 1%. (this wasn't a consideration a couple of years ago as there hadn't been any salary increases for a number of years).

I am wondering if it might be worth discussing the option of ceasing contributing towards the DB scheme and see if I can enrol/continue in the DC scheme?

The reason I'm looking in to this is that deferred pensions are increased in line with CPI (5% pre-April 2009 and 2.5% post April 2009), and I have approx 18 years pre-April 2009 service and approx 11 years 2009 onwards. Would these increases actually benefit me more than continuing with a limited 1% rise with salary increases?

Would it be treated as a 'deferral'?
Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone

Comments

  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    cloud_dog wrote: »
    The reason I'm looking in to this is that deferred pensions are increased in line with CPI (5% pre-April 2009 and 2.5% post April 2009), and I have approx 18 years pre-April 2009 service and approx 11 years 2009 onwards. Would these increases actually benefit me more than continuing with a limited 1% rise with salary increases?

    Would it be treated as a 'deferral'?

    If you leave active membership and don't draw your pension, then you do indeed become a 'deferred' pensioner.

    What's the accrual rate for active members - i.e. how much do you built up for each extra year of active membership of the DB scheme?

    How much does your employer contribute to the DC arrangement/how much do you have to pay in to become a member? Will your employer match extra contributions?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,529 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    mmm


    - If you continue as a member of the DB scheme another year you gain an increase of 1/29th (3.4%) of your pension by being in the scheme a year longer plus possibly 1% from a wage increase, so 3.4%-4.4%
    - if you leave the DB scheme and there is no great increase in inflation you get say 2.5% increase in your pension plus an unknown amount of money to put into the DC scheme.


    So will this unknown amount of money be sufficient to pay for say a 2% increase in your pension? That should be easy to work out since you know the amount of money, use a Safe Withdrawal Rate of say 3.5% and compare it with the known DB pensions.



    Another factor is risk vs flexibility, especially if you wish to retire early.
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Linton wrote: »
    - If you continue as a member of the DB scheme another year you gain an increase of 1/29th (3.4%) of your pension by being in the scheme a year longer plus possibly 1% from a wage increase, so 3.4%-4.4%

    Not necessarily - depends what the current accrual rate is - may not have been constant during OP's period of membership.
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,417 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Linton wrote: »
    Another factor is risk vs flexibility, especially if you wish to retire early.
    Flexibility was a consideration (as per one of my previous thread conclusions).
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,417 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Brynsam wrote: »
    Not necessarily - depends what the current accrual rate is - may not have been constant during OP's period of membership.
    It has varied.

    1/60 x Final Pensionable Earnings x Pensionable Service to 30th June 2002 x ERF
    Plus
    1/70 x Final Pensionable Earnings x Pensionable Service from 1st July 2002 to 31st March 2007 x ERF
    Plus
    1/80 x Final Pensionable Earnings x Pensionable Service from 1st April 2007 x ERF


    So for me that is approx 12 @ 1/60 plus 5 @ 1/70th plus 12 @ 1/80th.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,417 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I've just looked up the current Group Personal Pension Plan contribution amounts and it appears the company has 'dumbed down' their contributions percentage in line with the introduction of the 'workplace pension', contributing 5.5%.

    In the old days, prior to the introduction of the workplace pension the company used to contribute 12% for the replacement DC scheme. I'm becoming a little less enamoured with my brilliant (?) idea.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    cloud_dog wrote: »
    I've just looked up the current Group Personal Pension Plan contribution amounts and it appears the company has 'dumbed down' their contributions percentage in line with the introduction of the 'workplace pension', contributing 5.5%.

    In the old days, prior to the introduction of the workplace pension the company used to contribute 12% for the replacement DC scheme. I'm becoming a little less enamoured with my brilliant (?) idea.

    It was an idea worth considering, especially if you were more interested in having some flexibility than maximising pension income. But 5.5% is highly unlikely to buy you the same amount of pension you'd accrue if you stay where you are...
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,664 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You could always start your own personal pension or SIPP and pay into that alongside the company DB to give you a bit of flexibility
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,417 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As a result of a previous thread and coming to the conclusion that I lacked sufficient flexibility I started making additional contributions in to my DB AVC (DC) scheme. I have taken this option as I benefit from SS. I have also executed a partial transfer of this account in to my SIPP so as to prove I am able to transfer these funds without the need for pension transfer specialist advice.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.