We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

HSBC Global Strategy Vs Vanguard LifeStrategy

Options
145791012

Comments

  • There really isn’t a need to hold 14 (!) ETFs to replicate VLS80. Complexity is bad particularly when there is no need. Lots of options, but here is one:

    10% Strategy of Lyxor Core Morningstar UK NT (DR) UCITS ETF. Cost 0.04% or 4 quid, assuming 100k total portfolio
    50% Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF cost 0.12% or 60 quid
    20% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc cost 0.22% or 44 quid
    20% SPDR Barclays 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF 0.15% 30 quid

    UK equity is being held within two separate ETFs. This is deliberate; IMHO one should be overweight in the home market

    Put this in AJ Bell and platform charges for SIPP are 0.25%, capped at 100 quid.

    Rebalancing - I am guessing one buy and one sell per year. Total cost 20 quid.

    Overall annual cost = 240 pounds; smaller % for larger portfolios. Makes 24 bp, I think. Not bad.

    You also benefit vs holding funds which have to pay Stamp duty.


    It looks like a lot of effort. Not TOO bad when you have one account but when holdings are spread over ISAs, SIPPs and trading accounts, x 2 for a couple and spread across two platforms for security, then less simple...!


    I have not seen any reason Vanguard don't do a version of VLS as an ETF


    C
  • JohnWinder wrote: »




    It looks close, at first glance. Way too much bonds/fixed interest for me though


    C
  • It looks like a lot of effort. Not TOO bad when you have one account but when holdings are spread over ISAs, SIPPs and trading accounts, x 2 for a couple and spread across two platforms for security, then less simple...!


    I have not seen any reason Vanguard don't do a version of VLS as an ETF


    C

    All investments should be treated as a single portfolio, at least that’s the conventional wisdom. Tax efficiency may impact which particular ETF goes into which account.

    I don’t find it complex at all, but it does require a spreadsheet (or a Google sheet in my case). Certainly more complex than a single multi-asset fund though.
  • ArchBair
    ArchBair Posts: 153 Forumite
    edited 14 November 2019 at 3:22PM
    Rather than hold either VLS or the HSBC GS range you’re could just hold a multi asset ETF such as the iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (there are also aggressive and Conservative versions).

    This would save quite a lot of money in platform fees depending on the platform. For example on Fidelity the platform fees are capped at £45 per annum for holding ETF’s (or IT’s). Therefore if you hold large sums in a multi asset fund there is a significant saving using the ETF multi asset fund. They all do a very similar job.
  • ArchBair wrote: »
    Rather than hold either VLS or the HSBC GS range you’re could just hold a multi asset ETF such as the iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (there are also aggressive and Conservative versions).

    This would same quite a lot of money in platform fees depending on the platform. For example on Fidelity the platform fees are capped at £45 per annum for holding ETF’s (or IT’s). Therefore if you hold large sums in a multi asset fund there is a significant saving using the ETF multi asset fund. They all do a very similar job.

    Is that available in the UK (via HL for instance) ? And how does it re-balance ?
  • ArchBair wrote: »
    Rather than hold either VLS or the HSBC GS range you’re could just hold a multi asset ETF such as the iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (there are also aggressive and Conservative versions).

    This would same quite a lot of money in platform fees depending on the platform. For example on Fidelity the platform fees are capped at £45 per annum for holding ETF’s (or IT’s). Therefore if you hold large sums in a multi asset fund there is a significant saving using the ETF multi asset fund. They all do a very similar job.

    Isn’t that in USD and traded in the US? If so, how easy would it be to trade on a British platform and what would be currency exchange costs?
  • ArchBair
    ArchBair Posts: 153 Forumite
    cisamcgu wrote: »
    Is that available in the UK (via HL for instance) ? And how does it re-balance ?

    I must admit I hadn’t noticed it traded in USD, I just made a search for a multi asset ETF and came up with this. May be worth a call to HL to see if they offer this ETF or if not whether BlackRock have a GBP equivalent?
  • ArchBair wrote: »
    Rather than hold either VLS or the HSBC GS range you’re could just hold a multi asset ETF such as the iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (there are also aggressive and Conservative versions).

    This would save quite a lot of money in platform fees depending on the platform. For example on Fidelity the platform fees are capped at £45 per annum for holding ETF’s (or IT’s). Therefore if you hold large sums in a multi asset fund there is a significant saving using the ETF multi asset fund. They all do a very similar job.

    That is the sort of thing to which I was referring, and for that reason. So it seems it IS possible in an EFF, but those particuar ones are very USA centric, with all/most bonds and fixed interest in USA. Also, I don't beleive they available in UK. Come on Vanguard, do something similar here!
  • bearshare wrote: »
    That is the sort of thing to which I was referring, and for that reason. So it seems it IS possible in an EFF, but those particuar ones are very USA centric, with all/most bonds and fixed interest in USA. Also, I don't beleive they available in UK. Come on Vanguard, do something similar here!

    Why would Vanguard do that? All the tools are already available:

    1. If you want simplicity then they have answer to your prayers: VLS funds. ETFs will always be a little bit more complex for a novice. And why would Vanguard want to cannibalize their own products?

    2. If your priority is minimal costs and maximum flexibility then you can execute the same strategy with 3 to 4 ETFs. Not really complex either, but cheaper and can be more efficient.

    What UK market seems to be lacking is free trading platforms and reasonably priced financial advice. If I were Vanguard, I would focus on this.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    :o
    What UK market seems to be lacking is free trading platforms and reasonably priced financial advice. If I were Vanguard, I would focus on this.

    Vanguard were built on the concept of piggybacking onto everyone else in the market suffering the cost.

    Someone has to be the market.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.