We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Quick quid about to go bust

Options
soolin
soolin Posts: 74,082 Ambassador
Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the eBay, Auctions, Car Boot & Jumble Sales, Boost Your Income, Praise, Vents & Warnings, Overseas Holidays & Travel Planning , UK Holidays, Days Out & Entertainments boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know.. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
«134

Comments

  • boo_star
    boo_star Posts: 3,202 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    soolin wrote: »

    With so many customers reclaiming and essentially getting interest free loans (despite being the riskiest borrowers you can lend to) it's not really surprising.

    The new-ish cap on interest charged can't have helped, especially if they didn't change their customer profile.
  • Aqua1985
    Aqua1985 Posts: 54 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    These not will not be missed. With the interest rates they were charged they were no good to man nor beast. Just a shame the refunds people were due will now not to be paid. Argument to be had that these types of claims should be covered in the same way bank deposits are.
  • 2 problems regarding refunds

    1: the financial ombudsman is heavily understaffed , often taking over 12 mths to sort a case out

    2: the financial ombudsman has no clout , they can make suggestions , but the loan co does not need to comply with them
  • Aqua1985 wrote: »
    These not will not be missed. With the interest rates they were charged they were no good to man nor beast. Just a shame the refunds people were due will now not to be paid. Argument to be had that these types of claims should be covered in the same way bank deposits are.

    Haven't YOU used payday loans? They were of use to you when you when it suited. Its just a shame people don't take responsibility for their own actions and not use payday loans irresponsibly in the first place.
  • I am just glad that another PDL company has bit the dust. If they had followed the regulators requirement to hold an assessment of affordability which was proportionate – to determine if a prospective borrower would be able to repay their loan. Regulators did provide all the necessary written guidance and rules. If the QQ policies and procedures did not consider the rules and guidance then that is just an example of another flawed business model.
    I work within the voluntary sector, supporting vulnerable people to rebuild their lives.

    I love my job

    :smiley:
  • Quickquid havnt gone bust


    there american parent company are worth millions

    what they have done tho is "the great escape"

    they now realise that UK legislation has cough up with them , and the days of reaping it in have gone

    by bailing out , they are bypassing all claims for compensation

    leave a couple of k in the pot , let the administrators split that between the many k of claims
  • ndf9876
    ndf9876 Posts: 404 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    2: the financial ombudsman has no clout , they can make suggestions , but the loan co does not need to comply with them

    Incorrect. FOS decisions made by an Ombudsman (not an Adjudicator) are legally binding.
  • Clive_Woody
    Clive_Woody Posts: 5,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Can't be many payday lenders left now, wonder where their previous audience will turn for money now.
    "We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein
  • ndf9876 wrote: »
    Incorrect. FOS decisions made by an Ombudsman (not an Adjudicator) are legally binding.

    correct , but as I have found out (with provident) they CANNOT force them to hand cash back
  • they are NOT NOT NOT going bust , they are simply bailing out of the UK , knowing that the FSO has and will make more cases against them

    instead of abiding by UK law and repaying interest , they are sneaking off scott free

    "QuickQuid's US owner Enova had been working for months to reach a deal with authorities after customers filed more than 3,000 complaints about the company with the financial ombudsman in the first six months of this year. But Enova's chief executive David Fisher has said the company will now withdraw from the UK this quarter."
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.