We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

State pensions to rise by 3.9% - MSE News

2

Comments

  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,633 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    westv wrote: »
    Remembering of course that any increase now benefits you when you claim.

    The ponzi scheme will collapse before then.
  • etienneg
    etienneg Posts: 540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Not every pensioner receives one of the two amounts quoted, as it all depends on number of NI years, SERPS/S2P, etc.

    Does the 3.9% increase apply to ALL constituent parts of the state pension, please?
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 33,868 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 16 October 2019 at 4:36PM
    etienneg wrote: »
    Not every pensioner receives one of the two amounts quoted, as it all depends on number of NI years, SERPS/S2P, etc.

    Does the 3.9% increase apply to ALL constituent parts of the state pension, please?
    No. For both pre and post 2016 pensions only the basic pension amount increases by the 3.9%. Pre 2016 additional pension and post 2016 protected amounts increase by the 1.7% CPI figure. https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-5032049/Why-parts-state-pension-rise-different-rates.html
  • No the amount above 168.60 a week for those with a good amount of SERPS / SSP only goes up by CPI.
  • etienneg
    etienneg Posts: 540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Thanks for the information, molerat and drumtochty.

    It's interesting that hardly anyone seems to mention things like this, so the population at large just sees headlines such as "State pensions to rise by 3.9%".

    It's similar with private pensions, where we always get comments about "gold-plated, index-linked pensions". There, different contributions result in different levels of indexation (if any), particularly pre and post 1988 contributions.

    Still, why let the truth get in the way of a good rant?!
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,816 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When the state pension goes up because of growth in average earnings it's effectively self-funded as the amount of National Insurance collected is higher because earnings are higher.
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 4,171 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    And in the meantime the government is saving ££££ by raising the retirement age forcing more and more older people into claiming working age benefits paid at £73.10 per week with no increases rather than state pension of £168.60/week with generous increases.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The reality is pensioners as a generation have by far the most wealth now

    After working for all their lives. Seems perfectly correct. Much of the accumulated wealth will likewise be spent over time.
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 736 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    something will give with an aeging population, Im nrly 50 and my state pension age is currently 67 but i'm planning on that changing to 69/70 on any forecasts I make .
    It wont be too long before 70 becomes the norm and eventually I can see it being phased out once all workers are forced to pay into a private pension
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,024 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Mick70 wrote: »
    something will give with an aeging population, Im nrly 50 and my state pension age is currently 67 but i'm planning on that changing to 69/70 on any forecasts I make .
    It wont be too long before 70 becomes the norm and eventually I can see it being phased out once all workers are forced to pay into a private pension
    If SPA had been increased with life expectancy since it was introduced I believe it would already be approaching 80 - so even 70 is generous. And that is SPA, not retirement age necessarily.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 348.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 241.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 618.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176K Life & Family
  • 254.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.