We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A couple of questions on my wife's national insurance record and ongoing NI contributions.

2»

Comments

  • vacheron
    vacheron Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    p00hsticks wrote: »
    Any reason why the benefit can't be in her name ? It would save you the hassle of having to do the transfer and ensure she doesn't miss out on the credits.

    When our son was first born she was not a full UK citizen and so was ineligible to claim.

    When we later asked about transferring the payment from me to her, we were told that the only way to do this would be for me to renounce my entitlement to the benefit, then once that was complete, she would then have to start a brand new application for which she may have to attend in person, then, when this was approved, she could then apply to have all the payments and credits which had been missed in the intervehing time back paid into her account.

    To be honest, just filling in the one page transfer form each year seemed a lot easier and safer! :rotfl:
    • The rich buy assets.
    • The poor only have expenses.
    • The middle class buy liabilities they think are assets.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 34,971 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    vacheron wrote: »
    Thanks. And it states 21 years needed before the 5th of April 2051.
    So, IMO, there is no point buying those missing years as she has more than enough time to fill any gaps nearer retirement age, the price only increases with inflation. You only need to start panicking if the amount of years needed is more than the number of years left to go, something to review every 5 years or so.
  • vacheron
    vacheron Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    molerat wrote: »
    So, IMO, there is no point buying those missing years as she has more than enough time to fill any gaps nearer retirement age, the price only increases with inflation. You only need to start panicking if the amount of years needed is more than the number of years left to go, something to review every 5 years or so.

    Great, thanks for putting my mind at ease. Plus I know a lot more now than I did this time yesterday! :T
    • The rich buy assets.
    • The poor only have expenses.
    • The middle class buy liabilities they think are assets.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    vacheron wrote: »
    When our son was first born she was not a full UK citizen and so was ineligible to claim.

    When we later asked about transferring the payment from me to her, we were told that the only way to do this would be for me to renounce my entitlement to the benefit, then once that was complete, she would then have to start a brand new application for which she may have to attend in person, then, when this was approved, she could then apply to have all the payments and credits which had been missed in the intervehing time back paid into her account.

    To be honest, just filling in the one page transfer form each year seemed a lot easier and safer! :rotfl:


    i am not a UK citizen and I claimed CB for 14 years
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Will she go back to work at some point?

    If so, you dont really need to buy those past years.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    vacheron wrote: »
    zagfles: Her record shows the £168.60 with 33 years left to pay. Thanks for clarifying what constitutes a qualifying year. So if I am reading your response correctly, HMRC won'r care if she earns 52 weeks pay at £118 (£6136) or 7 weeks at £876 (6136) in order to qualify?
    Yes those should be OK but note that it doesn't necessarily extend to other similar scenarios.

    For instance if she earned £118 for 50 weeks, £128 one week and £108 one week, same total, wouldn't be a qualifying year. Because the week earning £108 wouldn't count at all, as any week earning below LEL doesn't count.

    Also if she earned £6136 in a single week, that wouldn't be a qualifying year either as most of it is above the UEL. Earnings above the UEL don't count.

    Note - if she gets paid monthly, then instead of week, you need to use the monthly amounts for the LEL, UEL etc in the link I posted earlier.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.