We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Worth doing?

13»

Comments

  • Bravepants
    Bravepants Posts: 1,661 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    hugheskevi wrote: »
    The Teachers' Pension glossary says:
    So the part-time status appears to be irrelevant.

    As long as the best 3 years' salary over the previous 10 years aren't about to drop out of the calculation (ie they were something like 2008, 2009 and 2010) then it would seem she could be in the scheme without affecting the final pay figure used to calculate the pension.


    This is similar to the way the Civil Service pension works.
    If you want to be rich, live like you're poor; if you want to be poor, live like you're rich.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,912 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    However, she is planning to speak directly with them on Monday.

    Do come back and tell us how it pans out - it could be helpful to other posters.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,811 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 20 September 2019 at 6:36PM
    Sue_S wrote: »
    Please be very careful before opting back in. My sister has left the TPS because if she'd remained she'd have lost 2008 from her "best in 3" calculation. Due to high inflation/RPI/CPI increases that was one of her best years. She would have paid into the pension scheme all year and ended up having paid a full year's contributions to get her a lower pension!

    Yes 2008 will have fallen off as of March 2019. However the difference between that and the 2009/10/11 calculation with up to a year's extra service would have to be taken into account too.

    For example;

    2008/09/10 recalculated figure is £38077. 38 years service gives a pension of 38/80ths so £18086 pension and £54258 lump sum.

    2009/10/11 recalculated figure is £37673. 39 years service gives 39/80ths so £18,365 pension and £55096 lump sum.

    Did your sister get calculations for both or not?

    The there was also the death-in-service benefits of 3 times annual salary to consider.
    Speak to the TPS before making any decision and don't blindly opt back in as some posters have advised.

    Absolutely but if experience is anything to go by they will not be able to give you these calculations.

    What is needed is the actual spreadsheets which I had up to date till at least 2016. As I retired I didn't keep them up to date after that.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,811 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks everyone and she is going to ask for a written response. She actually held a promoted / higher paid role 10 years ago but then then took a lower grade purely teaching role. This was the main reason for opting out. However, she is planning to speak directly with them on Monday.

    It would have been helpful to have given that information in your post in the first place.

    if she's in a Union, she may be better contacting them as in my experience the TPS will not so specific calculations until your inform them of your wish to retire. I got a spreadsheet from the Union that allowed me to model exactly which 3 years would be used. They were spot on and a few people have used that spreadsheet on here.
  • zagubov
    zagubov Posts: 17,951 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If you visit the TP website, emails don't get speedy replies, and the website is a bit of a maze. When exploring it, take lots of screenshots to print out later.

    Phoning's usually better and faster, but be aware they can's suggest plans of action (as that would be advice) but they can talk about their consequences, so line up questions like if I do this will I then be allowed to do that?

    They are very helpful but they're not supposed to be proactive and push ideas on you.

    Don't expect them to be able to quote precise figures about your individual pension over the phone either- they take ages for them to work out.

    You may want to ask them whether unclaimed pension after your Normal Pension Age of 60 is lost or is eventually returned to you via actuarial enhancement or as arrears.

    Is it the case that you are still accumulating future benefits the longer you work past this age, and the index-linking is increasing these future benefits.

    Ask how can you check if you best salary years will fall off the end if you delay retirement too long.

    You may want to think about how this reduces your death in service benefits if you're using the pension for life insurance purposes to protect mortgage/family.

    You may be automatically offered a lump sum, plus the chance to sacrifice future pension income to enhance it. Once you decide on this, it is irreversible and can't be changed. The conversion rate isn't generous -each £1 you lose from your pension gives you £12 lump sum, but you're likely to live for up to 30 years after pension age, instead of just 12.

    If you're in England like me, you may find this page useful;
    https://www.teacherspensions.co.uk/members/resources/factors.aspx
    apologies if you're already familiar with this.

    Good luck. I'm partly retired and taking a long time to phase out my work, while collecting my (almost) full pension.
    There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker
  • My wife spoke to TP today and they advised that she should opt in again.

    She opted out in November as her 'best three years' were 2008-2010 when she was in a more senior role. If she had stayed in one of these years would have fallen out of this period and her average would have dropped.

    However, news to me was that she has been advised to join again because at the point of opting out that is seen as the end of a specific period of taking pension and she is now seen as being in a 'pension break' period. If she opts in again her original 'best three years' are safeguarded and when she does retire the best three years of the second period are considered against this first period and the higher of the two will be the basis of her pension.

    Now getting in writing!
  • Sue_S
    Sue_S Posts: 308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    My wife spoke to TP today and they advised that she should opt in again.

    She opted out in November as her 'best three years' were 2008-2010 when she was in a more senior role. If she had stayed in one of these years would have fallen out of this period and her average would have dropped.

    However, news to me was that she has been advised to join again because at the point of opting out that is seen as the end of a specific period of taking pension and she is now seen as being in a 'pension break' period. If she opts in again her original 'best three years' are safeguarded and when she does retire the best three years of the second period are considered against this first period and the higher of the two will be the basis of her pension.

    Now getting in writing!

    Thanks for this, I've just sent the info to my sister suggesting she contact the TPS - so perhaps she'll opt in again too...
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,811 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    However, news to me was that she has been advised to join again because at the point of opting out that is seen as the end of a specific period of taking pension and she is now seen as being in a 'pension break' period. If she opts in again her original 'best three years' are safeguarded and when she does retire the best three years of the second period are considered against this first period and the higher of the two will be the basis of her pension.

    Now getting in writing!

    Has she approached her Union yet? Not necessarily the local rep but someone from Union HQ should be able to help too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.