We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Keeping/contributing to pensions with low values
Comments
-
-
You're right they are the default funds that I was put on. I take it aged 30, with 35-40 years to go, would be long haul, so could chance a higher risk/reward fund?
The default funds are a bit more safety first .0 -
Albermarle wrote: »That's the normal kind of advice you will get at your age . To have a 100% equities fund if you feel brave or 80% anyway . You will see more volatility but history shows a very good possibility that you will win over the long term .
The default funds are a bit more safety first .
Thanks for that. I was contemplating swapping it for a bit more risk/reward. I recently opened VLS 80% so similar level would have been what I would aim for.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards