We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Coal mining report - Mortgage

Good morning,

Hoping someone can help. Posted in here as mortgage is relevant.

The property we are looking to purchase has flagged historical subsidence claims between 1996-2001. An accepted damage notice claim.
All settled.

Obviously alarm bells are ringing but we love the property. I know the vendor has a mortgage on the property and it has been sold in 2005 and then 2009 to the current vendor. It's near an old coal mine although everything else on report is fine.

Our surveyor did not mention anything about potential subsidence although the coal search came back after his report. I have also run some insurance quotations and a number of lenders offer reasonable buildings insurance. We had a building survey.

Our solicitor has a duty to inform our lender clearly but has anyone been through something similar and had a positive outcome?

Comments

  • As long as you can get standard insurance then historic subsidence isnt a dealbreaker. My own house had subsidence in the 80s and my lender didnt care one jot when the valuer went out
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Many have had positive outcomes. Others will have had negative ones. But their houses will be different to yours, with different issues and also in different locations, so it's irrelevant.

    You need to satisfy yourself that the subsidence work was done correctly and whether you feel it's an ongoing risk.
  • Ce1979
    Ce1979 Posts: 14 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    Many have had positive outcomes. Others will have had negative ones. But their houses will be different to yours, with different issues and also in different locations, so it's irrelevant.

    You need to satisfy yourself that the subsidence work was done correctly and whether you feel it's an ongoing risk.

    Yes, agreed. I feel if we have carried out all of our due diligence and all paperwork and work carried out can be verified, then we would like to proceed.

    Assuming the lender also agrees of course.
  • Ce1979
    Ce1979 Posts: 14 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    As long as you can get standard insurance then historic subsidence isnt a dealbreaker. My own house had subsidence in the 80s and my lender didnt care one jot when the valuer went out

    Thanks. The valuer was out quite early on in the process and all was fine. The survey was completed without any major highlights. Just the coal mining report which has tempered things a bit.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.