We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Taking pension out as cash rather than annuity. can the amounts be spread over tax years?

Hi All.

I have a Pegasus pension with a retirement date in November this year. Scottish Widows have written to me to ask me how I would like to take it. I parted company with the IFA who advised me to take it many years ago and I have been managing it myself. I have a health condition which makes me want to take the pension as cash rather than annuity. I understand I can take 25% tax free. Is it possible to take the remainder in instalments across 3-4 years to stop hitting the 40% tax bracket? does it depend on wether Scottish Widows allow it or not, or is it a right I have?

Thanks for all advice.

Sololite
«1

Comments

  • If you have the correct product (which in some circumstances means moving companies) you can take it as you wish.

    Many who post on here opt for 25% of each payment being tax free rather than taking 25% up front.
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,470 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The pension rules allow you to take the cash in installments over as many years as you want. However, the rules don't dictate that every pension provider must allow this or restrict what they can charge to do so.

    Most providers will make some charge for administering the withdrawal of cash, if only because they have to pay the tax on the remaining 75%. There are some who provide a withdrawal service for free. So you need to ask Scottish Widows whether they provide the service and at what cost. If the cost is going to be more than a £150 per annum, you could consider transferring the cash to a Self-Invested Personal Pension and withdraw it from there. Cost of withdrawing the cash should be no more than £150 pa.
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,633 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Two ways to do what you want :

    Drawdown - Means taking the 25% tax free cash and then the rest can be taken as and when but is subject to tax .
    UFPLS - Means taking payments from the pension, where each payment is 25% tax free and the rest taxable
    Either could suit your needs but the critical thing is whether your current pension can support either form of withdrawal . Most older ones can not, and if that is the case then you will need to transfer to a new pension, either with SW or someone else.
    Probably best to give SW a call to clarify the situation
  • sololite
    sololite Posts: 19 Forumite
    wow, that was quick - thanks everyone. I will call Scottish Widows. I love it when they tell me that mine is a 'legacy' product. They don't see the irony that all there current products will be 'legacy' when their customers want to access their pension
  • sololite
    sololite Posts: 19 Forumite
    Scottish Widows tell me that the pension has a guaranteed annuity rate of 9% which is making me think I should take that rather than draw down over several years, which they tell me I could do but will incur charges. does that make sense?
  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,405 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    sololite wrote: »
    Scottish Widows tell me that the pension has a guaranteed annuity rate of 9% which is making me think I should take that rather than draw down over several years, which they tell me I could do but will incur charges. does that make sense?

    Considering that the annuity range between 2.88% to 4.39% @ 65 at the moment depending on the type. Does it have an index-linked element and is it single or joint life?
  • SonOf
    SonOf Posts: 2,631 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary
    I love it when they tell me that mine is a 'legacy' product. They don't see the irony that all there current products will be 'legacy' when their customers want to access their pension

    Their current product is not a legacy plan as it's coded to allow changes and on a flexible contract. Legacy plans are hard coded on software and cannot be changed easily or cost effectively.
    Scottish Widows tell me that the pension has a guaranteed annuity rate of 9% which is making me think I should take that rather than draw down over several years, which they tell me I could do but will incur charges. does that make sense?

    Its a valuable rate. It also means that if the fund is over £30,000 and you still want to draw it using UFPLS or drawdown, you would need to use an adviser.
  • sololite
    sololite Posts: 19 Forumite
    JoeCrystal wrote: »
    Considering that the annuity range between 2.88% to 4.39% @ 65 at the moment depending on the type. Does it have an index-linked element and is it single or joint life?

    Thanks Joe. It is single life and I will ask them about any index linking.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,100 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    sololite wrote: »
    Scottish Widows tell me that the pension has a guaranteed annuity rate of 9% which is making me think I should take that rather than draw down over several years, which they tell me I could do but will incur charges. does that make sense?

    Depends on your health condition.
    You earlier said you wanted to withdraw ASAP due to health.
    If you mean you don’t expect to live very long then even 9% may not be good for you.
    An annuity means you’ll get income until you die but there will be nothing left afterwards (unless there is a min payment period).
    So if you died just after year 1 you’d only get 9% and that’s it.
    Of course if you live for decades then it’s great.

    In general that’s a fantastic rate but if you meant you don’t expect to live very long then it’s not necessarily best for you or did you mean something else? Such as being much less active in 3-4 years?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.