We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
State pension
jackson5london
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi Guys,
Would like to make a question to understand more about how state pension works. Let’s assume that we have 2 persons. Person A receives minim wage and pays approximately £90 every month for National Insurance. Person B receives £3000 per month and he pays approximately £270 every month for National Insurance. Will these 2 receive the same state pension?
Thank you in advance for your help
Would like to make a question to understand more about how state pension works. Let’s assume that we have 2 persons. Person A receives minim wage and pays approximately £90 every month for National Insurance. Person B receives £3000 per month and he pays approximately £270 every month for National Insurance. Will these 2 receive the same state pension?
Thank you in advance for your help
0
Comments
-
jackson5london wrote: »Hi Guys,
Would like to make a question to understand more about how state pension works. Let’s assume that we have 2 persons. Person A receives minim wage and pays approximately £90 every month for National Insurance. Person B receives £3000 per month and he pays approximately £270 every month for National Insurance. Will these 2 receive the same state pension?
Thank you in advance for your help
Yes they would get the same if they were in the work place the same amount of time.0 -
Under the CURRENT rules yes. However in the past the person earning more and paying more NI would have rec'd more pension through SERPS. Many people retiring over the next couple of decades will have a mixture of old and new pension entitlements, and SOME of them will therefore receive higher than the basic pension.0
-
Under the old system as msallen advises and these are very rough numbers and stopped additional increases from April 2016, the person on the mimimum wage or a similar deinflated amount would have earned another £2 per week for each year worked from the Second State Pension and Serps from around April 1978 until April 2016 at todays prices. If the were contracted in to the state pension but no increase for the years they were contracted out of the state pension. That was in addition to the figure today of £129 a week for the basic state pension after 30 years.
The person on £36,000 a year or similar would have earned say another £4 a week for those years they were contracted in to the state pension at todays prices plus the old basic state pension today of £129 a week.
The last time I found the information and it was about 4 years ago, the government in an answer in the House of Commons had advised the average state pension paid then including the Second State Pension and SERPS and the old Graduated Pensions was around £150 per week.
This was around the figure for the new state pension for those who qualified for the full new state pension in 2016.
Again can I advise these are very rough figures.0 -
Thank you in advance for your help
They can both obtain a state pension forecast to check their current position.
https://www.gov.uk/check-state-pension0 -
"From each according to his ability to each according to his needs."0
-
jackson5london wrote: »Hi Guys,
Would like to make a question to understand more about how state pension works. Let’s assume that we have 2 persons. Person A receives minim wage and pays approximately £90 every month for National Insurance. Person B receives £3000 per month and he pays approximately £270 every month for National Insurance. Will these 2 receive the same state pension?
Thank you in advance for your help
Probably. It's called the Welfare State. However, Person B is much more likely than Person A to pay into a private/occupational fund, and so will have more to live on in retirement.0 -
Person B is much more likely than Person A to pay into a private/occupational fund, and so will have more to live on in retirement.
But person A's employer should be providing a workplace pension scheme and both he and the employer should be contributing.
The same applies to person B but with a higher salary his pension should eventually be higher.0 -
But person A's employer should be providing a workplace pension scheme and both he and the employer should be contributing.
The same applies to person B but with a higher salary his pension should eventually be higher.
That's why I said 'more likely', sweetie - seems a lot of People A are opting out of the workplace pension on affordability grounds.
Believe it or not, a lot of people in the LGPS (including full timers on much more than minimum wage) opt out on affordability grounds.0 -
sweetie
Ooh, you are awful! But I like it..:)
Yes, I know that people unwisely don't join up.
Somebody I knew had reason to be grateful that her husband was forced to "see the light" many years back when it became compulsory to join the employer's scheme - he died under 60 when she was just over , and the widow's pension made all the difference to her standard of living.
When he first took the job with the company, the contributions to the DB FS Scheme were "too expensive" and "he didn't expect to stay long" - in fact he was there from around his late twenties to the day he died suddenly and unexpectedly from a heart attack.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

