We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HELP! Understanding the Alpha Pension Scheme
Comments
-
SallyAnneBooth wrote: »Thanks for all the brilliant responses here!
What are peoples thoughts on Alpha vs Partnership? I appreciate it comes down to personal preference but would like to get your opinions.
And yes we're capped at 1% atm as well, no decent pay rise for the forseeable future. It's frustrating as our London weighting always remains constant and they don't adjust for inflation or CPI
Partnership vs Alpha is more than a personal preference. In Partnership less money is paid into your pension pot (and yes you do have one in Partnership) overall. Because Alpha is only a notional employer contribution all you can do is think of it in terms of what you would have to pay to get the same benefits. But in general terms with Partnership the personal and employer contributions are less and the benefits lower. Once you are over 40 the Partnership employer's contribution rises but for a 30 year old Partnershsip makes little sense unless you plan to move to the private sector in the near future.Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
OP, I hope that isn' your real name that you are using as a user name ?
You've already revealed in this thread that you are a 30 year old civil servant in the London area - you're setting yourself up to be the potential victim of identity fraud if you're not more circumspect.0 -
SallyAnneBooth wrote: »Employers monthly contribution: £1013/month.
Part of this will allocated to fund the existing scheme funding deficit. Not specifically to you. In effect it is an internal tax imposed on your employer. When deciding how to allocate their monetary resource. Balancing the National accounts is a long term project.0 -
Dazed_and_confused wrote: »I think you've misunderstood this. The annual pension will be based on their final salary but isn't equal to the final years salary. Unless they have worked a very long time!
It is more likely to be 40/60ths of their final salary or possibly 40/80ths. 40/60ths schemes may not have an automatic lump sum either.
Alpha is 60ths and Classic is 80ths, hence the lump sum."You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "0 -
-
sammyjammy wrote: »Alpha is 60ths and Classic is 80ths, hence the lump sum.
I think you mean premium is 60ths, not alpha.
Alpha is 43rds, part of the difference reflecting that future increases are linked to CPI rather than salary and that the normal pension age is State Pension age rather than age 60.0 -
SallyAnneBooth wrote: »Thanks for all the brilliant responses here!
What are peoples thoughts on Alpha vs Partnership? I appreciate it comes down to personal preference but would like to get your opinions.
And yes we're capped at 1% atm as well, no decent pay rise for the forseeable future. It's frustrating as our London weighting always remains constant and they don't adjust for inflation or CPI
Hi.
I've recently joined the Civil Service and I posed this very question recently.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5997447/civil-service-pension-decision&highlight=partnership
I already have a fairly good DB pension in payment so I was all set to join the Partnership scheme, despite the Alpha scheme being a very good scheme especially if you are in your 50's apparently (I'm 54).
However I've been automatically enrolled into Alpha and I decided it would be a bit daft to turn down such a scheme, so I'm staying in it. In fact I've opted to do the EPA which brings the age down to 65.
If you already have a substantial DB pension built or building up, then I guess I can see the reasons for Partnership to give you some flexibility, like I was considering in my case. If you don't then I would definitely stick with Alpha - the figures just don't stack up with Partnership.0 -
Thanks for all the responses everyone I am very grateful, has definitely aided my decision to stick with Alpha.0
-
You seem to be concentrating on a lump sum.
i suggest if you want one, not to take one from your DB pension but instead open a DC pension alongside (be it a sipp, AVC or PP}) and build that up and take a lump sum from it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


