We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Remortgage - Overpay or Reduce Term
stu2500
Posts: 193 Forumite
Apologies if this has been covered before but, I'm coming up for remortgage soon on my Natwest mortgage and I am keen to pay it off as quickly as possible. We originally took the mortgage out for 25 years and pay £591 per month. Looking at rates available (I understand these aren't guaranteed but hypothetically), we could remortgage at a 20 year term and the payment would be circa £540 per month (we would over pay the extra £60 available to us as well).
Is it best to reduce the term further or just overpay the extra monies we have? Or, does it make little difference?
Is it best to reduce the term further or just overpay the extra monies we have? Or, does it make little difference?
0
Comments
-
In terms of cost it makes little difference providing you dont exceed any over payment limits.
The general rule is make the monthly mortgage payments as cheap as possible so if circumstances change youre not comitted to the higher payments.
For me personally i went down the reduced years option because im not the kind of person to arrange and ensure over payments are made each month and i would inevitably find something to spend the money on instead.
Depends on how you manage your finances really, if youre organised and have control go for the overpayments, if youre forgetful and can be led by gluttony tie yourself to the higher costs (try and account for as many changes in your circumstances as imaginable)0 -
In terms of cost it makes little difference providing you dont exceed any over payment limits.
The general rule is make the monthly mortgage payments as cheap as possible so if circumstances change youre not comitted to the higher payments.
For me personally i went down the reduced years option because im not the kind of person to arrange and ensure over payments are made each month and i would inevitably find something to spend the money on instead.
Depends on how you manage your finances really, if youre organised and have control go for the overpayments, if youre forgetful and can be led by gluttony tie yourself to the higher costs (try and account for as many changes in your circumstances as imaginable)
Thanks for that. I think I'd prefer the reduced years as i then have no option to not overpay, or I then can't forget to overpay. We have rainy day savings and such, therefore I'm not concerned about not being able to afford monthly payment etc.
Thanks again.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards