We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Independent Financial Advice - Recommendations

124»

Comments

  • Prism wrote: »
    To be fair, you don't need to be hugely qualified to provide financial advise or accountancy. .

    Bookkeeping - no, but accounting really does require education and experience. Not for simple returns, but for businesses there are a lot of subtleties and knowledge of what the state and auditors would accept. It’s a fact that accountants have to graduate and work under supervision before they are qualified.
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,861 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Agreed. They are. However accountants, lawyers, doctors and vets also have to study for years, have experience of working under supervision. You can’t start operating on people or dogs by a bit of self-education.

    I guess on that measure many people have to sell themselves or their business to some degree. However it seems to me that those particular professions are rewarded by a considerably higher salary for their years of study. I don't get the feeling that a typical IFAs is in that same category whatever we feel about their charging methods. You would need an awful lot of millions under advice before that 0.5% charge turns into cash in someone's pocket.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Prism wrote: »
    I guess on that measure many people have to sell themselves or their business to some degree. However it seems to me that those particular professions are rewarded by a considerably higher salary for their years of study. I don't get the feeling that a typical IFAs is in that same category whatever we feel about their charging methods. You would need an awful lot of millions under advice before that 0.5% charge turns into cash in someone's pocket.

    We have recently taken on a new young employee who will be on a 6 year plan to become qualified. Earnings will be way below the national average for nearly all of that period. She will also be studying beyond that for chartered status. So, it will probably be 10 years studying and learning. And we all have CPD beyond that as things are continuously changing.

    As an employer, we will suffer higher costs for a lot more of that period. Licences for software, supervision, monitoring and more frequent file checks, especially until compentent status has been granted. And for much of that period, there will be little extra income for us.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.