We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Investment changes moving from occupational to SIPP

Novice pension planner considering setting up for DIY

Question about diversification. What portfolio changes I should be researching and looking into as I approach the switch from occupational scheme fund holding to setting up one or more SIPPs to draw benefits from the DC fund.

Fairly comfortable with a global equities heavy, low fee drag, indexation approach - perhaps leavened at the 10-20% level with other investments (commodity, property, more speculative/emerging markets.

Currently invested 100% equities
Will review this for retirement phase but I am fairly sold on the logic of remaining invested over up to 40 years and unconvinced by lifestyling/bonds=age. Still thinking 80%+ and flexible drawdown methods (McClung book etc).

Switched in 2018 into a Global Ethical Equities fund (from UK AllShare indexer). Passive. FTSE4Good Global Developed indexation. Very low cost. Felt it was viable for a short term flip away from UK heavy exposure - but it isn't the long term solution on its own.

LGIM Fund profile:


Geography - 51% US 25% Europe ex UK 9% UK 8% Japan 3% ANZ 1% Asia (dev) Other (OK)
23% Fin, 20% tech 13 health 11 consumer 10 industrial 8 consumer services 4 oil/gas 4 telco, other


75% in 20bn plus cap
50% in 50bn plus
Little invested in capitalisations below 5bn

This last aspect seems less than ideal and I guess should guide me when I look for the funds to switch into. Also no alternative assets (property, commodities), and nothing for the more speculative element).

Interested in input on two aspects. Am I missing some horrible concentration of risk with my temporary solution beyond what is described above. Thoughts from others experience further along the track with global equities + portfolio planning.

Thank you

Comments

  • gm0
    gm0 Posts: 1,322 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Still hope to provoke pointers to things I need to learn about. Here are the options I am evaluating for funds in the existing occupational scheme (assuming they remain there subsidised and protected for a time). Move them into a SIPP based version per original post. I have understood that the move brings: Less protection. Slightly higher fees. A whole lot more fund choices. Can buy bond ladders to hold to maturity as a cash substitute should I want to. More ways to implement drawdown.

    Some of these should be easy for me to translate to a short list of Vanguard and Fidelity or similar funds. Here are the existing ways I can construct my global equities portfolio. Passives and Active choices.

    I have 5 year performance data access to unit prices and fee drag so can do that compare. It is the logical structure - 3 ways to do what is broadly a "similar" thing but maybe not really that is a bit puzzling and what that means if anything for diversification / a longer term "in retirement" view.

    Passives

    A) A tracker fund to FTSE4Good Developed (LGIM)

    B) A Global equity tracker made of:

    45% MSCI World Adaptive Capped 2x Index
    45% FTSE Developed World Index - GBP Hgd
    10% FTSE Emerging Index

    C) A geography weighted portfolio UK + Overseas mix made up of

    Composite of 50% FTSE Developed (ex UK) Index and
    50% FTSE Developed (ex UK) Index - GBP Hedged
    Mixed with FTSE All Share Index tracker or a UK active option
    Assuming market size weights for the mix to be broadly the same as A,B

    Is there an obvious way to tell a,b,c,d apart - advantage/disadvantage beyond "ethical" feel good with A and the appearance of some currency hedging in places for B,C ?

    Active option

    D) A global actively managed fund made up of:

    BlackRock DC Diversified Growth
    LGIM Global Equity Market Weights (30:70) Index Fund - 75% GBP Currency Hedged
    Schroder Intermediated Diversified Growth

    For bonds:

    An index linked gilts fund mostly 2030-2050 75% UK
    A fixed gilts and corporate bonds fund mostly (66%) UK gilts
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    You might be better posting on the Savings & Investments board as they discuss investment strategies a lot more over there.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.