We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Scottish Widows or SIPP?

I have around 50K in scottish widows pens portfolio four fund and it seems to be not doing an awful lot after initially looking quite promising. I want to put money into some other funds which I can do withing the SW wrapper but I find it hard to fathom exactly how much I'm being charged both AMC and dealing charges and ongoing charges for different funds.
How does SW charges compare with other pension providers? Would I be better off finding a cheap SIPP and putting my pension pot in that?

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have around 50K in scottish widows pens portfolio four fund and it seems to be not doing an awful lot after initially looking quite promising.

    What do you mean it is not doing an awful lot?

    My gut feeling on that is that you don't understand investing. Nothing to be ashamed of but if your response to that is to then look at the most advanced pension option which has lower consumer protection then you are going about it the wrong way.
    How does SW charges compare with other pension providers?
    SW have had hundreds of pension versions over the decades. Many of which had negotiated charges. So, we cant tell you what yours is.
    Would I be better off finding a cheap SIPP and putting my pension pot in that?

    And what would that achieve?
    You havent said anything about the alternative and I suspect you dont know enough about what you have either.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 31,210 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Suggest as a first step you call SW and find out the current charging structure and for advice on how to find the charges for alternative funds directly on their website.
    Most pension funds went down during 2018 as world stock markets had a downward correction.
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,861 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Scottish Widows pensions often have a reduced charge negotiated with your company if its a workplace pension. Core funds typically are charged at between 1% and 0.4% (or possibly lower). You need to find out what that charge is. A SIPP might not be cheaper

    Pension portfolio 4 is quite defensive (60% bonds) and has done quite well over the last 12 months compared to many other funds. It might seem low but its doing better than pension portfolio 1, 2 and 3 over the shorter term.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Presumably at some point you will have selected PP4, perhaps in response to a attitude to risk questionnaire. My pension is with SW in PP2 and I get a rebate on AMC which I think are total 1% before rebate with the SW PP funds.
    I think....
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,783 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Personally, my view is that the SW offers a very limited range of funds. Unless you can gain some advantage of contributions through a workplace scheme, I'd look elsewhere.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • EdSwippet
    EdSwippet Posts: 1,682 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kinger101 wrote: »
    Personally, my view is that the SW offers a very limited range of funds.
    Limited does not necessarily mean inadequate.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 31,210 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Personally, my view is that the SW offers a very limited range of funds
    Having a large range of funds is only useful for a very small % of investors . For most it is more likely to confuse or even panic them .
    I am not sure of the exact figure but I think that 90/95% of DC pension money is just in the default fund and probably a majority of these have probably no idea what they are invested in or even what a default fund is.
  • ex-pat_scot
    ex-pat_scot Posts: 726 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Albermarle wrote: »
    Having a large range of funds is only useful for a very small % of investors . For most it is more likely to confuse or even panic them .
    I am not sure of the exact figure but I think that 90/95% of DC pension money is just in the default fund and probably a majority of these have probably no idea what they are invested in or even what a default fund is.

    In the last few DC schemes I reviewed recently, 85% of scheme members were invested in the default fund.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,783 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    EdSwippet wrote: »
    Limited does not necessarily mean inadequate.

    I did say, in my view. But the offering from SW is poor.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,783 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Albermarle wrote: »
    Having a large range of funds is only useful for a very small % of investors . For most it is more likely to confuse or even panic them .
    I am not sure of the exact figure but I think that 90/95% of DC pension money is just in the default fund and probably a majority of these have probably no idea what they are invested in or even what a default fund is.

    It's better to overcome any confusion rather than remain in a default fund.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.