We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Unfair Interest Rates based on Address?

13»

Comments

  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Once you go to a full application you will get what rate you get.


    2.8%, 5.9, 7.5 is all irrelevant, your final rate will be decided when the application is live and accepted.
  • tizzwoz
    tizzwoz Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    robber2 wrote: »
    What is your reason for believing that it would not be legal?


    Rob

    I think it would be discrimination. Why do people in a "better"neighbourhood get better interest rates than people in "poorer" areas?
  • tizzwoz
    tizzwoz Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Uberior wrote: »
    Have you cross-referenced the addresses with the deprivation score?


    Can be interesting.

    Was interesting. It is bang in line with the interest rates quoted.
    First address, reasonably wealthy, best interest rate.
    Second address, most deprived, worst interest rate.
    Third address, less deprived, medium interest rate.

    So the people who are already worse off pay more in interest to buy things. I could understand if other factors played a role, obviously income, employment, etc. But as said before, these interest rates purely differ because of the address entered. I believe that is unfair.
  • tizzwoz wrote: »
    I think it would be discrimination.

    All risk profiling is discriminatory. It has to be, by its very nature.

    But they cannot discriminate on protected characteristics.
  • nick74
    nick74 Posts: 829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    tizzwoz wrote: »
    Was interesting. It is bang in line with the interest rates quoted.
    First address, reasonably wealthy, best interest rate.
    Second address, most deprived, worst interest rate.
    Third address, less deprived, medium interest rate.

    So the people who are already worse off pay more in interest to buy things. I could understand if other factors played a role, obviously income, employment, etc. But as said before, these interest rates purely differ because of the address entered. I believe that is unfair.

    Arguably you are right, but who said it was supposed to be fair?
    A lender can be as 'unfair' as they like as long as they don't discriminate based on protected characteristics:

    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/protected-characteristics/
  • robber2
    robber2 Posts: 559 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    tizzwoz wrote: »
    I think it would be discrimination. Why do people in a "better"neighbourhood get better interest rates than people in "poorer" areas?


    Because the reality is that they are less likely to default or have trouble keeping up with payments and are therefore less of an administrative burden and additional cost for the lender.



    Welcome to the real world.



    Rob
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.