We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

IHT - residence NRB

13

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Is she also struggling to spend income?
  • adonis10
    adonis10 Posts: 1,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Is she also struggling to spend income?

    Yes, massively. Spends about 5-10% of monthly income which isn’t a small amount so that is building at a rate as well.
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 21,631 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    adonis10 wrote: »
    Yes, massively. Spends about 5-10% of monthly income which isn’t a small amount so that is building at a rate as well.

    Well if she refuses to gift that then she just has to accept that the potential IHT on her estate will continue to grow unless she has to start spending on care costs. On a positive note if required she will be able to afford the best care available.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 4 February 2019 at 5:36PM
    Buy more of the house she lives in off the daughter to get a bit closer to the full RNRB.

    Then regular gifts from income to stop the estate growing.
  • adonis10
    adonis10 Posts: 1,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Buy more of the house she lives in off the daughter

    To increase the potential RNRB allowance? Haven’t established if her current holding of 1/3 means that the allowance is reduced proportionately.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    adonis10 wrote: »
    To increase the potential RNRB allowance? Haven’t established if her current holding of 1/3 means that the allowance is reduced proportionately.

    Why would you think that?
  • adonis10
    adonis10 Posts: 1,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why would you think that?

    Why not? Can’t find anywhere that says the whole allowance is available even if only a part share is owned. Or is it on the absolute value in £ terms rather than holding?
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    adonis10 wrote: »
    Why not? Can’t find anywhere that says the whole allowance is available even if only a part share is owned. Or is it on the absolute value in £ terms rather than holding?
    It is capped at the value of the residential interest you own be it 100% or 10%, as long as its your residence, or a greater amount if you can use the downsizing allowance
  • adonis10
    adonis10 Posts: 1,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Tom99 wrote: »
    Assuming they live in this house and they also inherited their deceased spouse's RNRB of £125k then 2x£125k=£250k but capped at £170k because that is the value of their share. I would think.

    I've been doing some reading up on the subject and it looks like it can get absurdly complicated, however it would seem that £100k could be transferred as her spouse died in Dec 2017 and that gets added to her RNRB. Let's assume the time comes that she passes on in 2019/20 when the allowance is £150k, simple maths suggests that up to £250k is available; assuming her share is still worth £170k the RNRB is then capped at £170k and added to the basic allowance of £650k giving a total allowance of £820k and no IHT to be paid.

    Given what I have read, the above calculation seems far too simple and there must be more to it!
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    adonis10 wrote: »
    I've been doing some reading up on the subject and it looks like it can get absurdly complicated, however it would seem that £100k could be transferred as her spouse died in Dec 2017 and that gets added to her RNRB. Let's assume the time comes that she passes on in 2019/20 when the allowance is £150k, simple maths suggests that up to £250k is available; assuming her share is still worth £170k the RNRB is then capped at £170k and added to the basic allowance of £650k giving a total allowance of £820k and no IHT to be paid.
    Given what I have read, the above calculation seems far too simple and there must be more to it!
    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]No, its the RNRB at the time of the 2nd death so 2x£125k now but 2x£175k after 5/4/2020.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]It sounds like the downsizing rules might apply, was the house sold in 2018 wholly owned by her and what was the sale price?[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Not needed at the moment but if the cash eventually exceeds £650k it will be.[/FONT]
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.