We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ad hoc draw-down from SIPP?

2»

Comments

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 1,881 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks, dazed and confused I ignored emergency tax (doh!), as you say I believe my figures are correct once the correct tax code is used and that the tax free allowance is already taken up by other income.
  • They look right to me once the BR code is in place.
  • k6chris
    k6chris Posts: 787 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks all - great input as always. It's not urgent yet, but wanted to get my head straight about how it would work - you think you understand something, then you start to question yourself!


    Thanks again!
    "For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"
  • squirrelpie
    squirrelpie Posts: 1,685 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It's not urgent yet, but wanted to get my head straight about how it would work


    One trick that can be used is to make a small initial drawdown, which triggers the provider to inform HMRC, which triggers HMRC to issue a tax code. Then when you start to make other more substantial drawdowns there's no emergency tax problem. Since you have time, you could do this. Be aware as others have said that making a drawdown will affect charges etc.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    k6chris wrote: »
    We are in the fortunate position that our core retirement funding is coming from 3 DB pensions, which will need to be supplemented by our SIPPs for things like holidays / car costs / one-off payments etc. At all stages we will remain basic rate tax payers. So far we have been using savings to do this top up but at some point we will want to use the SIPP.

    If one of you should die before 75 the survivor would then have tax-free access to the unused SIPP money of the deceased (assuming you've done the paperwork properly).

    So there's a case for leaving the tax-exposed part of the SIPPs as large as possible until you've passed 75. In other words, there's a case for drawing the SIPPs TFLSs first, and the other 75% later.

    The counter argument is political risk. If the basic rate of tax should rise above 20% (hello, Mr Corbyn!) then you might feel a chump not to have drawn it down sooner. Ditto if the ability to leave it to your widow/widower tax-free were withdrawn.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.