We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Civil Service Classic Pension
cobax
Posts: 3 Newbie
I will be taking my deferred Classic Pension next month when I turn 58. Main reason is to supplement my income as currently work part time. Friends who have previously taken their pension always seemed to be advised to take the larger lump sum offer and the smaller monthly pension.
My plan is to put the lump sum into a savings bond for 2 years as don't want to tie it up for too long until we see how Brexit pans out then just keep investing it until I retire and then start to use the capital. The best interest I can get at the moment would be 2.32%.
If I took either the larger monthly pension or the smaller, combined with my wage I would still be under the tax threshold.
Just wondered what peoples thoughts are on whether the advice of taking the larger lump sum would still be the way to go.
My plan is to put the lump sum into a savings bond for 2 years as don't want to tie it up for too long until we see how Brexit pans out then just keep investing it until I retire and then start to use the capital. The best interest I can get at the moment would be 2.32%.
If I took either the larger monthly pension or the smaller, combined with my wage I would still be under the tax threshold.
Just wondered what peoples thoughts are on whether the advice of taking the larger lump sum would still be the way to go.
0
Comments
-
Classic already has a 3x lump sum by default.
IIRC there is a little bit of scope to increase that (but not by much)to the however at a rate of 1:12 (ie £1 of pension gives you £12 lump sum) it is an appalling deal - a fair rate would be in the region of 1:20.
Your friends who were advised that were either in a defined contribution scheme or a different defined benefit scheme with a better exchange rate (or had some niche circumstances)0 -
Yes rate is 12:1. Some took their pension as part of redundancy package and others were pre 2016 if that makes a difference.
My gut feeling is to take the maximum monthly pension but the more I look into it I get more confused0 -
I personally would take the pension as-is, i.e. do not reduce the pension for a higher lump sum. That's what I'll be doing with my deferred Classic when the time comes..you can't beat guaranteed income
......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
0 -
P.s. just remember, if you're taking it early at 58, it's already going to be actuarliy reduced by around 10%-ish just for taking it early..........Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
0 -
-
Thanks Gunjack, know it will be reduced by 10% for taking it early and fine with that. Think like you I'll take the 'as is' and not reduce it any further.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
