We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
SIPP v workplace pension
qwer11
Posts: 19 Forumite
I wonder if there is any advantage of using SIPP apart from giving a bigger choice of funds?
I have a workplace pension with Zurich and the fees for passive funds can be as little as 0.08%. I want to contribute more towards my pension and I am not sure if it is worth opening a SIPP or just increase my contribution to Zurich?
I have a workplace pension with Zurich and the fees for passive funds can be as little as 0.08%. I want to contribute more towards my pension and I am not sure if it is worth opening a SIPP or just increase my contribution to Zurich?
0
Comments
-
I wonder if there is any advantage of using SIPP apart from giving a bigger choice of funds?
I have a workplace pension with Zurich and the fees for passive funds can be as little as 0.08%. I want to contribute more towards my pension and I am not sure if it is worth opening a SIPP or just increase my contribution to Zurich?
If your workplace pension gives you access to a reasonable choice of funds so that you can construct a portfolio to meet your goals, then, as I think you already realise, there would seem little point in opening a SIPP.
If you can salary sacrifice into your workplace pension, then even better....0 -
I did the same exercise recently and compared one existing and one older workplace DC pension with SIPP alternatives .
My current employers pension ( Zurich now Scottish Widows ) had an average total cost of 0.6% for both the platform charge and the funds charge. ( even when not using passive index trackers ) as the employer had negotiated a good discount on normal charges . Another older one with Standard Life was the same , with a 0.55% discount on the standard charge . Depending on the SIPP and the charging structure /size of funds , most worked out more expensive . Only the flat fee ones worked out very marginally cheaper.
One issue to be aware of is that some older workplace pensions do not offer a drawdown option when you come to take the money . The two mentioned above do , so no reason for me to move to a SIPP , as only advantage would be a wider range of funds , which I have no need for.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards