We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
US Mid term elections



As Election Day approaches, concerns are being raised in Kansas over voting rights and access to the polls. The movement and elimination of some polling places is sparking fears that casting a ballot may be more difficult for some this year.
Nowhere are worries greater than in Dodge City, where residents must leave town if they want to vote on Election Day.
The city has drawn national scrutiny over voting rights since Ford County Clerk Debbie Cox — citing construction — moved its only polling location to a building south of the city limits. The site can’t be reached by sidewalks and is separated from much of the city by train tracks. Sixty percent of the town’s residents are Hispanic.
Comments
-
Won't be able to surely?
This is part of a coordinated process by the Republicans to stop certain groups (poorer, black, Hispanic, who traditionally vote democrat) from being able to vote through various processes including requiring voter ID which they can't get/can't afford (e.g. meaning you have to spend a day travelling and waiting, losing a days pay) based on false claims of widespread fraud; closing polling stations to make it so people have to travel further (as per last); introducing various laws to de-register people who haven't voted for a while etcSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Won't be able to surely?
This is part of a coordinated process by the Republicans to stop certain groups (poorer, black, Hispanic, who traditionally vote democrat) from being able to vote through various processes including requiring voter ID which they can't get/can't afford (e.g. meaning you have to spend a day travelling and waiting, losing a days pay) based on false claims of widespread fraud; closing polling stations to make it so people have to travel further (as per last); introducing various laws to de-register people who haven't voted for a while etc
What about locating polling booths in police buildings, knowing that immigrants are not too keen on those places'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I thought the democrats handled the supreme court nominations thing incredibly badly - the sight of militant (possibly lesbian) feminists being strident I suspect works as an excellent rallying cry to the republican base whilst also possibly deterring wavering centralists and this I think has given the Republicans some momentum - all over an issue the democrats were never going to win.
Edit: happy to be proved wrong but just like here there seems to be a polarisation with Bernie Sunders being the US equivalent of Jeremy Corbyn and very likely to get the presidential nomination. Whatever happened to elections being won from the centreI think....0 -
I thought the democrats handled the supreme court nominations thing incredibly badly - the sight of militant (possibly lesbian) feminists being strident I suspect works as an excellent rallying cry to the republican base whilst also possibly deterring wavering centralists and this I think has given the Republicans some momentum - all over an issue the democrats were never going to win.
Edit: happy to be proved wrong but just like here there seems to be a polarisation with Bernie Sunders being the US equivalent of Jeremy Corbyn and very likely to get the presidential nomination. Whatever happened to elections being won from the centre
Wasn't too impressed with that.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Makes one appreciate the UK election system.0
-
Projections don't seem to have changed too much over the last month or so anyway from what I have seen, so if the polls are close to being accurate, the Republicans will retain the Senate (unsurprisingly given the seats being contested this time around), and the Dems should gain control of the House.
That said if the Dems can keep the deficit in the Senate to around the 51:49 it is now they should have a good shot in '20 when the Republicans will be defending some tough seats.
I wouldn't write off Trump in '20 either although the economy will probably be a bit tougher then, I suspect people will equally start to accept some of his other bizarre utterances as "normal", so you get less of an impact of him scaring out the Dems to vote, probably depends on who the Dems run, a relative extremist and Trump probably has a fair chance.
You can't ignore the fact that historically America usually likes to give its Presidents/parties 2 terms in the White House0 -
You can't ignore the fact that historically America usually likes to give its Presidents/parties 2 terms in the White House
I think with someone like Trump in power, all historical norms go out of the window!
Its down to the Dems. Put up any half decent candidate and they should win the next election. They would have won the last one had they done so.0 -
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Don't underestimate the disillusionment. The American Dream isn't working any longer for many.
I know that, but Hillary's unpopularity was key to Trump winning. Obama would have won easily.0 -
What about locating polling booths in police buildings, knowing that immigrants are not too keen on those places
Immigrants (unless naturalised citizens) cannot vote, they cannot register to vote, they will not be on the voting list so why would they try and go and vote? Sounds like one of these #fakenews stories Trump loves - like how the only publicly documented voter fraud in 2016 was someone voting for Trump twice.
In the US only a citizen can vote in federal elections, given you can be deported for doing so, an illegal risking trying to vote (which requires them to go to the authorities and present ID and register) would be a massive risk because they'd be found out as not there legally. Even state elections non-citizens have been banned since the last one (Arkansas) outlawed it in 1926.
In reality the amount of voter fraud is so low it's non-existent - a study runded by Carnegie Corporation of New York and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation found 56 non-citizens voting in the 11 years 2000-2011Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards