We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Cheapest SIPP provider for non-earner

2

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    zolablue25 wrote: »
    Thanks dunstonh. I'll have to have a better search for providers.

    SIPPS have become the fad after a period of high returns. As if it's easy when investing to make money. Without a sizable sum it's difficult to build a fully diversified portfolio that covers all eventualities.
  • zolablue25
    zolablue25 Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    SIPPS have become the fad after a period of high returns. As if it's easy when investing to make money. Without a sizable sum it's difficult to build a fully diversified portfolio that covers all eventualities.
    That's why it was my intention to use a diversified fund within the SIPP.
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    I think maybe Cavendish would be the cheapest at 0.25%. They don't do drawdown but I don't think they charge a fee to transfer elsewhere when the time comes.
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,419 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 November 2018 at 5:39PM
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    If you are going to definitely buy Vanguard then I'd wait a while and see if Vanguards proposed SIPP appears, rumours were it would be late this year.
    I see Vanguard have changed their default information from late 2018 to 'shortly'.... mmmm.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    cloud_dog wrote: »
    I see Vanguard have changed their default information from late 2018 to 'shortly'.... mmmm.

    Suggest 2019. Live from the start of the new tax year perhaps seem most opportune.
  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Is your wife on track for a full state pension ?
    She can check her personal forecast here ...
    https://www.gov.uk/check-state-pension


    If she still needs NI years going forwards then paying for those would probably be the first point of expenditure before investing in a personal pension
  • squirrelpie
    squirrelpie Posts: 1,661 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I see Vanguard have changed their default information from late 2018 to 'shortly'.... mmmm.
    Interesting. Maybe they'll wait until the post-brexit situation is clear?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 1 November 2018 at 6:22PM
    Interesting. Maybe they'll wait until the post-brexit situation is clear?

    It may have a small impact as many of Vanguard's funds are domiciled outside of the UK and they use passporting permissions to retail them in the UK. Passporting is ending with Brexit. Its replacement is not yet known. Plus, FSCS protection is not yet sorted in a no-deal scenario.

    There is also an ongoing court case which affects SIPP providers which could have a significant impact on costs. Along with the increased solvency requirements. This may make PPPs or a master trust scheme cheaper to offer than SIPP (PPPs dont have to offer insured funds as they can be insured at contract level). Plus, having a SIPP that only invests in Vanguard funds is a bit of a weak option.

    It is also possible that Vanguard have realised that they are picking up high levels of DIY investors but with low value. Larger investors are unlikely to want to use Vanguard directly. So, the cross-subsidy spread may not be as much as they hoped and with the increased costs of offering the pension wrapper, it may be that they are thinking carefully about costs. Or maybe the ISA offering has not been as successful as hoped (now that others can undercut them)

    Vanguard apparently use FNZ as the software provider and FNZ already supports SIPPs. So, software is certainly not going to be the issue and with no legacy business to port over, there isn't anything on that side that would delay things beyond their planned timescale. Or maybe they couldnt book time with FNZ. Aviva's platform conversion to FNZ took longer than expected. Ascentric are about to move to FNZ and Old Mutual are moving to FNZ Q1/2 next year.

    The FCA also recently completed a platform review and a pension review and had particular concerns over drawdown on DIY platforms. The outcomes of that may well have changed plans.

    Or it can be a whole range of other things......
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Personally I would go with AJ Bell Youinvest for this year and put the money into Vanguard Lifestrategy. By next April it should be more clear where Vanguard Investor are up to with their SIPP launch.
  • zolablue25
    zolablue25 Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    p00hsticks wrote: »
    Is your wife on track for a full state pension ?
    She can check her personal forecast here ...
    https://www.gov.uk/check-state-pension


    If she still needs NI years going forwards then paying for those would probably be the first point of expenditure before investing in a personal pension


    She is about 4 years short. We are not going to start paying extra yet as she is still about 15 years away from State Pension age and could well reach the required level through working during those years. If it becomes obvious that isn't going to happen then we will buy her 4 years.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.