We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Thoughts on this rate?
Comments
-
Here it's going to be at least 42% tax and NI, conceivably more.
Not if (as has been mentioned) it's put into a DC pension fund after it's been taxed in that fashion...Conjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0 -
Paul_Herring wrote: »Not if (as has been mentioned) it's put into a DC pension fund after it's been taxed in that fashion...
Fair enough, but weren't we told that he has limited AA? (The 2% NIC probably isn't worth fussing over here.) Still, that's true of both options.
Ah, but isn't AA treated differently for DB and DC purposes? That sounds like IFA territory to me.
On a weekend when people are bemoaning the forthcoming inability to get RPI-linked income from ns&i I might still incline to pocket some.Free the dunston one next time too.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards