We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Company Pension Question

Hi All. I'm just looking to see if anyone can enlighten me on a matter about my NEST pension?

I was landed with it a couple of years ago by my company who had to provide everyone with a pension. I'm not particularly happy with it though, and would like to find a better pot to pay my pension into.

My question to my company was whether they would pay into a new pot that I choose instead of the NEST one. While my boss sees no reason not to (he says it makes no difference to him), the accounts director tells me they can only pay into NEST.

Why would that be? Is the company legally obliged to only pay into the NEST pot they have given us all?

Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated...

Comments

  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,449 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They have to make sure that the scheme they pay into is meeting all aspects of the auto enrollment regulations. Your best bet is to keep contributing whatever the employer can match and set up your own private pension instead.
  • Thank you. So basically, if the new pot met all the auto enrolment regulations, they should have no problem paying into that instead?

    Apologies if I'm misunderstanding, I'm very green on issues of pensions.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Your employer chooses the scheme they have nominated as the auto-enrolment scheme. Not you. You do not get a choice in the matter.

    The employer is only required to pay into their scheme. If you are a key worker then the employer may decide to do something different for you. However, you would need to opt out to do that as you would not be in the auto-enrolment scheme registered for that employer.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,545 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Perhaps the cost of converting their IT system and admin procedures etc so that every employee could have a different pension provider could be prohibitive
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Why would that be?

    Administration time and cost. Everybody in the organisation could choose a different pension provider. The employer is not in business to manage your own personal affairs.
  • Thanks all. Think I'm beginning to get a clearer picture.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.