We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Final written warning suspended for2 years , does that affect my reference ??
another_casualty
Posts: 6,506 Forumite
I've probably posted something similar here a long time ago .
I'm just wondering if there is a difference between a final written warning and one that is suspended ,albeit for such a long period .
I left that company 15 months after the disciplinary hearing . This obviously means that I left on best behaviour until I resigned . If I stayed , the suspended warning would have been erased after another 9 months .
I'm trying to get back on track and may have an interview for another job soon .
Please advise
Thanks
I'm just wondering if there is a difference between a final written warning and one that is suspended ,albeit for such a long period .
I left that company 15 months after the disciplinary hearing . This obviously means that I left on best behaviour until I resigned . If I stayed , the suspended warning would have been erased after another 9 months .
I'm trying to get back on track and may have an interview for another job soon .
Please advise
Thanks
0
Comments
-
another_casualty wrote: »I've probably posted something similar here a long time ago .
I'm just wondering if there is a difference between a final written warning and one that is suspended ,albeit for such a long period .
I left that company 15 months after the disciplinary hearing . This obviously means that I left on best behaviour until I resigned . If I stayed , the suspended warning would have been erased after another 9 months .
I'm trying to get back on track and may have an interview for another job soon .
Please advise
Thanks
Given that they can say anything they like in a reference, providing it is true and not deliberately misleading, it depends entirely on their policy and / or how much the person writing the reference likes (or hates) you!
Some, perhaps many, companies only give bare bones references whereas others write essays!0 -
Thanks undervalued

I won't go into an essay here . The person I offended was my new boss at the time , the personnel officer :rotfl:
The bizarre thing was she did sign my leaving card . We shook hands on the day I left and wished me all the best
I could only give one weeks notice or I would've been homeless.
This worked out , as I had loads of holiday pay accumulated .
The HR officer never spoke to me though .0 -
another_casualty wrote: »Thanks undervalued

I won't go into an essay here . The person I offended was my new boss at the time , the personnel officer :rotfl:
The bizarre thing was she did sign my leaving card . We shook hands on the day I left and wished me all the best
I could only give one weeks notice or I would've been homeless.
This worked out , as I had loads of holiday pay accumulated .
The HR officer never spoke to me though .
OK, but nobody can give you a definitive answer to what sort of reference they may provide.
Most likely it will be neutral or bland but if somebody wants to be difficult they clearly have the opportunity.0 -
Thanks again undervalued .
If I am asked about any warnings , I will say nothing and if I'm pulled up at a later date I will explain .0 -
Some, perhaps many, companies only give bare bones references whereas others write essays!
Pretty much every company I've ever worked for has had a reference policy of stating the former employee's start and end dates, job title and salary - and nothing else.
Is this not the case across the board? Given the number of questions on here around how good/ bad a reference may be, I'm guessing not...0 -
Pretty much every company I've ever worked for has had a reference policy of stating the former employee's start and end dates, job title and salary - and nothing else.
Is this not the case across the board? Given the number of questions on here around how good/ bad a reference may be, I'm guessing not...
I think many companies are now getting a lot cagier about what they will put in a reference, but the snag is that if a direct question is asked about disciplinary history, they either answer honestly or refuse to answer - and the refusal says it all, really.0 -
I think many companies are now getting a lot cagier about what they will put in a reference, but the snag is that if a direct question is asked about disciplinary history, they either answer honestly or refuse to answer - and the refusal says it all, really.
Quite.
Those concerned about what an employer may put in a reference really need to consider the alternative. Generally a refusal to provide a reference or even a failure to respond will be interpreted as having nothing good to say!
Except for a few regulated occupations there is no legal obligation to provide a reference, or even respond in any way to a request.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards