We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
dormant credit agreement
Options

willdebeast
Posts: 3 Newbie
in Loans
Dear forum,
My first post here so hello to the good folks of this forum. I'd appreciate any advice.
As a student in the period 2012 - 2015, I applied for a student loan. I have a copy of the credit agreement signed and dated May 2012. From my recollection (can't find letter, and it was some time ago), the application was subsequently rejected. However, I then unexpectedly received around £2,000 from them in November 2013.
My question is, how long may a credit agreement reasonably lie dormant ? If I agreed to enter a contract, is it reasonable to assume that I would still agree 18 months later ? My feeling is that it is not reasonable, and a new agreement should have been sought by SLC / SFE. But I cannot point to any standards or regulations which would bolster my view.
Any ideas anyone ? Thanks.
My first post here so hello to the good folks of this forum. I'd appreciate any advice.
As a student in the period 2012 - 2015, I applied for a student loan. I have a copy of the credit agreement signed and dated May 2012. From my recollection (can't find letter, and it was some time ago), the application was subsequently rejected. However, I then unexpectedly received around £2,000 from them in November 2013.
My question is, how long may a credit agreement reasonably lie dormant ? If I agreed to enter a contract, is it reasonable to assume that I would still agree 18 months later ? My feeling is that it is not reasonable, and a new agreement should have been sought by SLC / SFE. But I cannot point to any standards or regulations which would bolster my view.
Any ideas anyone ? Thanks.
0
Comments
-
I'm Assuming you returned the money if you didn't need it ?0
-
No, I kept it. Of course I will repay, but I wish to argue that due to their fookup I owe the amount of the loan only (no interest).0
-
If imoney has been sent to you in error, then you only repay the capital.
You should of course let them know at the earliest opportunity.0 -
willdebeast wrote: »From my recollection (can't find letter, and it was some time ago), the application was subsequently rejected.
I suggest you don't have an enforceable contract (ask them for a [e]signed copy there of) and that zx81's advice is sound and should be followed. Plainly there has been an administrative error which you have [just] become aware of and will repay the amount, ideally immediately, not unreasonably on a mutually agreeable plan.
Whatever you do, do repay the capital, their error is not a gift.The views expressed here are my own. I am not a Solicitor nor am I affiliated with any of the parties I mention. If you disagree with any of my comments please say in whatever way feels most natural to you. No one self improves in a bubble!0 -
From what you describe it doesn't sound like a dormant credit agreement to me. You applied and you were rejected therefore a credit agreement doesn't exist.
SLC have inexplicable paid £2,000 into your account so that's all you need to repay.0 -
willdebeast wrote: »Dear forum,
My first post here so hello to the good folks of this forum. I'd appreciate any advice.
As a student in the period 2012 - 2015, I applied for a student loan. I have a copy of the credit agreement signed and dated May 2012. From my recollection (can't find letter, and it was some time ago), the application was subsequently rejected. However, I then unexpectedly received around £2,000 from them in November 2013.
My question is, how long may a credit agreement reasonably lie dormant ? If I agreed to enter a contract, is it reasonable to assume that I would still agree 18 months later ? My feeling is that it is not reasonable, and a new agreement should have been sought by SLC / SFE. But I cannot point to any standards or regulations which would bolster my view.
Any ideas anyone ? Thanks.
I'm not a lawyer by any stretch of the imagination, but this is where you may find your stumbling block.0 -
Thanks all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards