We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Forced to resign on the spot

2»

Comments

  • Fireflyaway
    Fireflyaway Posts: 2,766 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    I resigned earlier this year as I knew I would have been let go anyway. It was scary but it's worked out great. I'm really happy in my new job!
    Try not to focus too much on what happened. It sounds unfair but it's probably just cost cutting rather than anything personal. Just keep applying. Don't wait to hear back as unfortunately these days many employers are just too rude to get back to you. Send off those applications. I'd also say don't be too picky. The idea is to get an income, you can keep applying for better jobs once you have landed something to get the bills paid. Go to agencies in person rather than online and apply to companies direct when you can. Hopefully in the end you will get a better job anyway!
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I can't understand why they didn't say "your position is redundant", here's your two-month notice period as garden leave".

    Making you resign means that, if you wanted to claim JSA, the DWP would say you had made yourself unemployed deliberately and therefore not eligible for JSA immediately your notice expired.

    If they had declared a redundancy then, once you ceased to be an employee and if you had not found other work, you could claim JSA.

    I doubt they were remotely bothered about OP's ability to claim JSA (and doubtless didn't even think of it). Possibly they had a policy where people got a redundancy payment regardless of length of service, possibly they wanted to avoid making someone redundant for (internal) political reasons.

    Possibly OP's face just didn't fit any more.
  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I can't understand why they didn't say "your position is redundant", here's your two-month notice period as garden leave".

    Making you resign means that, if you wanted to claim JSA, the DWP would say you had made yourself unemployed deliberately and therefore not eligible for JSA immediately your notice expired.

    If they had declared a redundancy then, once you ceased to be an employee and if you had not found other work, you could claim JSA.

    I wonder if you could tell the job centre you were 'constructively dismissed', which to all intents and purposes is true. By the time they've figured it out and decided whether or not to sanction on that basis you'll probably be back in work!
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Masomnia wrote: »
    I wonder if you could tell the job centre you were 'constructively dismissed', which to all intents and purposes is true. By the time they've figured it out and decided whether or not to sanction on that basis you'll probably be back in work!

    In fairness the OP got 2 months of wages to find s job.
  • annandale
    annandale Posts: 1,451 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That sounds dreadful, I think you are much better out of it
  • annandale
    annandale Posts: 1,451 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Making you resign means that, if you wanted to claim JSA, the DWP would say you had made yourself unemployed deliberately and therefore not eligible for JSA immediately your notice expired.

    This is not true. A decision maker will look at all evidence and then decide whether to sanction or not as the case may be.

    Giving out misinformation to someone who is stressed and ill is not helpful. It is decided on a case by case basis
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.