We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
226 pension age with Aviva
topfmine
Posts: 11 Forumite
After trying to draw out my small 226 pension pot with Aviva (see my other thread), i finally got the letter i requested, today in the post which i asked for at the start of August. It reads ' Aviva has made a business decision to keep the minimum retirement age for section 226 policies as age 60'.
So can this business decision overrule the 55 year rule for drawing out a 226 policy. If Aviva are in the right then all 226 policy holders with Aviva will have to wait till they are 60 so it looks.
They said it's in your original contract which i have asked them to provide, which i am still waiting for, as i am sure i had to wait till i was 65 years of age in the original contract. How far back does the 60 years of age rule go back, did this apply with original 226 policies.
So can this business decision overrule the 55 year rule for drawing out a 226 policy. If Aviva are in the right then all 226 policy holders with Aviva will have to wait till they are 60 so it looks.
They said it's in your original contract which i have asked them to provide, which i am still waiting for, as i am sure i had to wait till i was 65 years of age in the original contract. How far back does the 60 years of age rule go back, did this apply with original 226 policies.
0
Comments
-
So can this business decision overrule the 55 year rule for drawing out a 226 policy.
yes.If Aviva are in the right then all 226 policy holders with Aviva will have to wait till they are 60 so it looks.
No. They may not allow crystallisation until 60 but transfer is not an issue.They said it's in your original contract which i have asked them to provide, as i am sure i had to wait till i was 65 years of age in the original contract.
S226 RACs had a minimum age of 60 by law until 2006. The 2006 changes aligned the terms with PPPs. Making them age 50 rising to 55 in 2010 (other changes included the ability to take 25% TFC which RACs did not have. Previously, they got 3 times the annual as TFC). So, your policy documentation will state 60.
This is the first case I have heard of any provider of RACs enforcing the pre 2006 age rule. Possibly due to the fact that any Aviva RACs I would have come across would have been transferred unless GARs and most GARs dont kick into until after age 60.
Maybe that is the issue. Most RACs will likely be taken at 60+ or transferred out. Not many would be taken before age 60. The systems running these old fashioned contracts will almost certainly be hard coded and maybe Aviva dont feel the significant cost of changing it is worth it for the very tiny number of cases that would use it.
Anyway, your solution is to transfer it.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards