We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
N271
Comments
-
Thanks, even though I'm still baffled as to how the court feels they can do that even though i have in effect already won the case when the defendant didn't return the directions questionnaire twice. The n24 letter clearly says failure to return the directions questionnaire will mean that I automatically have the right to enter judgement I hope you see what i mean by bias, to me it seems the court is giving the defence another chance again. What can I do about this?
Thanks again
I do see what you mean. It happens all the time.0 -
At a guess, i would suggest that the Court still needs to go through the motion of allocating the case just so a Judge can actually stamp the case closed in plaintiffs favour.
The hard part will be getting the defendant to pay up.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards