We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Partial TFLS advice.

Options
Could, if it made financial sense, you take 10% TFLS at 55, another 10% at 56 and the last 5% at 57 and continue to dump £30k pa into your pension (via salary sacrifice) for those three years? Also, if you took 10% of your TFLS does the next 10% apply to the whole pot again, after it has (hopefully) grown for another 12 months, or does the second 10% only come from the 'untouched' portion of the original pot (which may or not have grown)?

Thanks.

Comments

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    When you take the TFLS you "crystalise" the pot. When you crystalise a pot you take 25% TFLS. So if you take 10% of your total portfolio as TFLS you are effectively creating two separate pots, 40% of the original crystalised and 60% uncrystalised. Extra contributions are added to the uncrystalised portion.
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Check if your provider has the necessary systems and software to allow this - older arrangements may not be able to offer this.

    For a general explanation of what you can and can't do, see https://www.pensionwise.gov.uk/en/take-cash-in-chunks#continuing-to-pay-in
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Could, if it made financial sense, you take 10% TFLS at 55, another 10% at 56 and the last 5% at 57 and continue to dump £30k pa into your pension (via salary sacrifice) for those three years?

    The pension recycling rules are intended to stop - or at least limit - the drawing of TFLS to allow more contributions. You, however, say "continue to dump ...": if that implies that you have been dumping in that sort of amount for a few years that would be interpreted as meaning that the TFLS was not the means of your increasing your usual pension contributions, so you would probably be in the clear.

    You might like to google for the rules and search out discussion threads on this forum.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • pensionpawn
    pensionpawn Posts: 1,016 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Surely there is no falling fowl of pension recycling rules if the 25% TFLF is mainly used to repay debt which then frees up income, that was previously being used to service the debt, to replenish the pension fund over the coming years?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Surely there is no falling fowl of pension recycling rules if the 25% TFLF is mainly used to repay debt which then frees up income, that was previously being used to service the debt, to replenish the pension fund over the coming years?


    The pension recycling rules are somewhat vague with a number of criteria which must be met if HMRC are likely to consider pension contributions as recycling. One of the criteria is that you are deliberately using the TFLS to put 30% more money into your pension than you otherwise would have done. However paying off a debt is in itself a reasonable thing to do with the TFLS, many people do this. So I dont believe there is any difficulty there.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 2 August 2018 at 11:54PM
    Surely there is no falling foul of pension recycling rules if the 25% TFLF is mainly used to repay debt which then frees up income, that was previously being used to service the debt, to replenish the pension fund over the coming years?

    Read the rules rather than assuming that HMRC are mugs. They understand that money is fungible.

    I think Linton is being an optimist and HMRC would be within their rights to scorn your argument. On the other hand I'm an optimist too: I still haven't read about anybody being punished under the recycling rules so I don't see why you shouldn't try it on.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • pensionpawn
    pensionpawn Posts: 1,016 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    I suppose the best thing to do is write to them shortly before I want to decide the way forward and get the answer in writing!
  • Dox
    Dox Posts: 3,116 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I suppose the best thing to do is write to them shortly before I want to decide the way forward and get the answer in writing!

    Dream on - do share it if you succeed. It'll be a first! Just be aware that if you do that, you might fall foul of the 'pre-planned' bit of the legislation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.