We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

excessive broker charges?

Hi all, Newbie here and hoping for some advice.

My colleague at work has got himself into a bit of a pickle with his finances and i am trying to help him sort things out.

Up until last year he was mortgage free (inherited some funds and purchased house outright). Last Sept, he decided to take a mortgage out on his house to raise funds to buy a car and pay of some huge debts for his partner (love is blind, she left him a month later!)

Anyway, to the point of my query, this young man is quite naive when it comes to these sorts of things and used a broker to arrange his mortgage.

Looking through his paperwork to see what we could do to reduce his outgoings or possibly re mortgage, i was astounded to see that not only did the Broker get £480 commision from the Mortgage provider,
the brokers charged him £1,995.00 - on a £30,000 mortgage!

surely that cannot be a fair charge on such a low mortgage? or am i really out of touch? Its on an 8 year term at £495 per month, to move it he will be charged £2000.00. never seen the likes of it before!

Can anyone help? any words of advice?
«1

Comments

  • herbiesjp
    herbiesjp Posts: 8,499 Forumite
    Yes it is excessive

    There are plenty brokers who are fee free and so would have been happy with the £480 from the lender.

    However if he has signed a fee agreement of some sort then he has agreed to the T&Cs of the broker. Did they give him an Initial Disclosure Document (Key Facts document) explaining if they are whole of market advisers etc, what fees they charge etc and when they are refundable?

    What paperwork does he have?
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,101 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    That is extemely excessive. It is a rip off charge. It doesnt matter about the size of the loan, it doesnt justify commission and fees to that amount.

    However, financial services companies are required to disclose charges before any work starts where charging begins. So, if you dont shop round and go with an expensive option, there is little you can do about it after the event.

    For future reference, the FSA is looking into what is called customer agreed remuneration where you and the adviser agree a charge at the start and the commission can be used to offset that with any difference being rebated if surplus (or used to reduce product charges) or any shortfall being made up by the client. This is only come in with investment business to begin with and only with IFAs. However, it may find its way into mortgage business as the FSA is apparantly not happy with the regulation of mortgages and is considering bringing it in line with investment class business. In the meantime, many IFAs have already adopted customer agreed remuneration as well as some mortgage advisers. Nothing stops you asking your mortgage adviser/IFA to do it that way and at least you know where you stand.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • It is an outrageous fee, but as stated above your friend would have signed to agree to this at the outset. Given the commission of 1.6% he obviously got placed on an adverse rate too - did he have adverse credit. I'm just glad a lot of these sharks are going to the wall now
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Mr_helpful
    Mr_helpful Posts: 3,233 Forumite
    He ought to go to the OFT and complain
    I like to give people as many choices as possible to do what I want them to. (Milton H Erickson I think)
  • it is excessive but if your friend signed documents to say he would pay the fee I doubt there is much you can do about it. Unfortunately he has learned the hard way.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • it is high but I if he signed and agreed then I doubt he would have a leg to stand on. Also what lendder? That is a proc fee of over 1% only a secured loan provider or subprime lender would pay that! he needs to find out why he was put with the lender! If he is a high street client that has been put with a sub prime lender then he should be complaining!

    Obvioulsy we need to know more. Did he pay the 2k or was it added. I doubt a good lender would accept that amount on 30k however some secured loan companies may do!
    :confused:
  • It sounds excessive, however these fees probably offset the cost of offering 10 other people sound mortgage advice that they didnt take up with the same advisor and then went to the lender directly. It happens all the time......Simon
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.

    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
    (Perspective Finance - FSA Regulated 453002)
  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It sounds excessive, however these fees probably offset the cost of offering 10 other people sound mortgage advice that they didnt take up with the same advisor and then went to the lender directly. It happens all the time......Simon

    I doubt it in the case of "sub prime"

    2 if brokers charge these types of fees, then no wonder they lose 90% of their enquries !!
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
  • I have had conversations with some 'Compliance People' who have told me that they believe that the 'Treating customers fairly' initiative from the FSA will mean that complaints about fees being excessive for the work required will soon be entertained.

    Indeed, I have been told by my network (and Dunstonh's) that they would investigate a complaint where they felt the fee charged was not in line with 'Market Trends' meaning that they will expect their member firms to have a clearly defined charging structure that can be justified (tying in with Customer agreed remuneration).

    Do not take this as gospel, but it could be worth a complaint on the basis that the fee was excessive and not in the spirit of Trating Customers Fairly. Depending on the firm and the network they belong to (if any) your friend may get a result. He may even get a result from the Financial Ombudsman. No guarantee at all, but what will it cost him - nothing.
    I am an IFA (and boss o' t'swings idst)
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as an IFA, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • I think the TCF initiative is a pain in the bum and some nobody has come up with a new idea to make our lives harder! I mean... if you do your job correctly and run your bunsiness correctly you will be treating your client fairly! I dont need a pen pusher who has never seen joe public let alone spoke to them tell me if I am looking after my client or not!

    Rant over!
    :confused:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.