We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Drawdown - Explained
Comments
-
Ah , right . I think I!!!8217;m starting to get it . Thankyou very much for your very helpful replies . Would I be right in saying that whatever sum is left uncrystalised you could always take 25% tax free but if you did the entire amount would become cristalised ?Would I also be correct in saying that any funds left at death that were crystalised would be subject to tax whereas if they were uncrystalised they could be inherited tax free ?Lastly , could any funds that are crystalised be invested in exactly the same products as uncrystalised , many thanks ?0
-
Thankyou Triumph13 this makes sense . So after the age of 75 crystalised or uncrystalised it all becomes taxable on death . So I guess it might make sense to take 25% and crystallise what is left before age 75 .0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards