We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Pension Statement Worries

2»

Comments

  • cisamcgu
    cisamcgu Posts: 113 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts
    edited 29 June 2018 at 8:42AM
    With VERY rough and ready calcs, if you include the £400 per month, then your final amounts would be in the region of :

    £157K (-3%)
    £227K (0%)
    £311K (2.5%)

    I think :)
  • RichardS
    RichardS Posts: 177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thank you all - if that's the case (that my £400 contributions are not taken into account) then I feel much better - I have just emailed my FA to confirm that. It seems pretty stupid not to take them into account though. One thing I didn't add is that this is a Discretionary Fund and I regularly (sometimes a couple of times a week) get notified of fund changes etc. Is that sort of thing worth paying higher charges for or is that what most people have anyway?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,459 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    One thing I didn't add is that this is a Discretionary Fund and I regularly (sometimes a couple of times a week) get notified of fund changes etc. Is that sort of thing worth paying higher charges for or is that what most people have anyway?

    Personally, i don't like using DFMs. It adds a layer of costs that appears to do offer little or nothing in value for the consumer. Discretionary permissions are nice. It allows changes on the fly without delay. The alternative is advisory and that means the adviser cannot change an investment fund without your permission. So, for an adviser, it is less work to use discretionary. However, advisory is perfectly fine as the adviser can talk through the changes with you rather than just do them without you knowing why.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • RichardS
    RichardS Posts: 177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks dunstonh - I don't think I would have the time, knowledge or confidence to handle that so I'm probably better off trusting them to make the changes they are making (I suppose!)
  • RichardS
    RichardS Posts: 177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I got an apologetic reply from my FA because they had left out my contributions. The new Projections are £158K (LOW), £219K (MID) and £304K (HIGH).

    Slightly higher than cisamcgu predicted in LOW but a bit less in MID and HIGH
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.