We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Why don't lenders "like" Help to Buy Remortgages
sh856531
Posts: 452 Forumite
Hi all
I've seen a bit in the press recently detailing how there isn't that much appetite amongst lenders for Help to Buy Remortgages. I'm not sure how true that is, versus just some lazy journalists needing something to write about, but assuming it's a least partially true - does anyone have a view on why that might be?
So with a Help to Buy mortgage, my understanding is that the lenders risk is significantly reduced as the government would be the first to take a loss if the customer defaulted. So in my case - the government would need to swallow the first 20% of any loss before Nationwide lost a penny.
Assuming good lending practices, the chances that a good bank would lose much on these deals seems fairly marginal and therefore there is some fairly risk free profit to be made?
Yet we're told that whilst lenders are quite keen on being the original lender, they are less keen to be a remortgager of these deals after the initial 2 - 5 year fix is up.
Does anyone have any insight into why this would be? I know the banks aren't daft, so they must be accounting for a variable that I haven't identified - I just can't figure out what it is
Thanks all
S
Sample article describing the problem:
https://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/help-to-buy-remortgage/
I've seen a bit in the press recently detailing how there isn't that much appetite amongst lenders for Help to Buy Remortgages. I'm not sure how true that is, versus just some lazy journalists needing something to write about, but assuming it's a least partially true - does anyone have a view on why that might be?
So with a Help to Buy mortgage, my understanding is that the lenders risk is significantly reduced as the government would be the first to take a loss if the customer defaulted. So in my case - the government would need to swallow the first 20% of any loss before Nationwide lost a penny.
Assuming good lending practices, the chances that a good bank would lose much on these deals seems fairly marginal and therefore there is some fairly risk free profit to be made?
Yet we're told that whilst lenders are quite keen on being the original lender, they are less keen to be a remortgager of these deals after the initial 2 - 5 year fix is up.
Does anyone have any insight into why this would be? I know the banks aren't daft, so they must be accounting for a variable that I haven't identified - I just can't figure out what it is
Thanks all
S
Sample article describing the problem:
https://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/help-to-buy-remortgage/
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards