We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Trust from parents for medical needs

Hi
Ok so here is an interesting one that i'm desperately seeking help with, so far its a brick wall but seems like a complete injustice if nothing can be done.......
My friends mother is on her own and in the process of selling her house to go into a home in the next 6 months. Her son as life threatening condition that 'could' be treated privately (only, no nhs offering) abroad but will take 1 year for treatment to start.
His mother is willing and able to put money away for his treatment (£50k) but the problem we understand is this would be taken into consideration for her care cost !!!
Sounds absolutely ridiculous that a mother could pay for son's treatment with her hard earned money BUT will not be able to because of tax laws. Is this correct? Is there nothing that can be done in this case?
Thanks for any advice
D.S.

Comments

  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 19,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Nothing to stop the mother giving her son the money for his treatment. If the son actually uses the money for his treatment, it should not be regarded as Deliberate Deprivation of Assets.

    https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/care/social-care-and-support-where-to-start/paying-for-care-support/deprivation-of-assets/

    Nothing to do with tax.
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 23,210 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    As the mother is already intending to go into a home then it would be considered deprivation of assets if she required local authority help.

    If she is self funding then it wouldn't matter.
  • sheramber wrote: »
    As the mother is already intending to go into a home then it would be considered deprivation of assets if she required local authority help.

    If she is self funding then it wouldn't matter.


    Thanks to all for your replies, most appreciated.
    In answer to above she would be able to self fund but for how long is the question. The money left over might be able to cover costs for 6 months to a year of care but after this when money all gone would the 'assets' given away have to be recognised and recovered for care ?

    It's such a tricky one and no ' financial advisors ' seem to want to touch it as think they are trying to avoid paying care home fee's. All very sad


    D.S.
  • badmemory
    badmemory Posts: 10,055 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My only question would be why it would take a year to start what must be privately funded treatment & that will be why most would consider it deprivation of assets.
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 23,210 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    She wants to give her hard earned money to her son but then expects others to pay for her care with their hard earned money. The money for care home fees comes from Joe Public i.e you and me

    If the local authority consider deprivation of assets applies then yes they will assess her as still having the capital.

    A google search for care home fees deprivation of capital will provide information.

    The fact that no FA will advise also confirms the risks in doing this.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,518 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 13 April 2018 at 5:33PM
    What's the life threatening condition that can only be treated privately abroad and not for 12 months? (Just curious, but so would the LA be as well.)
    Mum could not self fund once her assets go down to 23K, so after giving her 50k away would that still leave her able to pay her own way at all?
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.