We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pension Robbery. You can't Have Your Money
Comments
-
The virtually guaranteed loser I was referring to is p-ing away between 40% and 60% of the money in tax and then using the remainder to buy property, vs not p-ing away 40-60% in tax and continuing to invest 100% in other assets within the pension.
This is also the virtually guaranteed loser you were referring to when you said "Given that he seems to under stand property better than pensions it doesn't seem to be a big gamble" in #54. "It" can't be read as referring to anything other than the OP's proposal.0 -
Malthusian wrote: »This is also the virtually guaranteed loser you were referring to when you said "Given that he seems to under stand property better than pensions it doesn't seem to be a big gamble" in #54. "It" can't be read as referring to anything other than the OP's proposal.
That is just wrong. It can certainly be read as meaning property as I intended, and made clear that was what I meant several times since.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards