We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

endownments issued in 1980

my endownment company, friends provident, has written to me advising me of a shortfall. I read that claims can only be made on policies issued after 1985. Can anyone clear that up and/or advise me what to do? I am planning a mortgage extension and am considering cashing in my policies which have about nine years to run.
«1

Comments

  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    How long did you take the policies for ?
    1980 + 25 would equal 2005 maturity anyway.
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
  • robnye
    robnye Posts: 5,411 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Paul_Dean wrote:
    my endownment company, friends provident, has written to me advising me of a shortfall. I read that claims can only be made on policies issued after 1985. Can anyone clear that up and/or advise me what to do? I am planning a mortgage extension and am considering cashing in my policies which have about nine years to run.

    yes - any claims on policies have a maximum 15 year, i had the same problem, with a policy taken out in 1987,
    smile --- it makes people wonder what you are up to.... ;) :cool:
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    Hello Paul,

    Gosh, 35 year endowments?

    Post some figs and we'll have a look.

    Guaranteed sum assured
    Attaching bonuses
    Surrender value
    Monthly premium
    Maturity date
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,122 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I would have thought that a 1980 policy would be showing a surplus. You have had some good years in there and would have been less affected by recent events than most. Plus you had LAPR which later endowments didnt get.

    Remember that shortfall projections do not include any terminal or additional bonuses that have built up. A 1980 policy should have some terminal bonus unless. A 29 year endowment/mortgage in 1980 would have been very unusual.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    Oh and who sold you the endowments?
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote:
    I would have thought that a 1980 policy would be showing a surplus. You have had some good years in there and would have been less affected by recent events than most. Plus you had LAPR which later endowments didnt get.

    It is Friends Prov of course, which was badly hit on the guarantees side.Of course the poster will have had a demutualisation bonus, which is more than the poor people at RSA can say.:(
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • Froggitt
    Froggitt Posts: 5,904 Forumite
    Id be surprised for a 1980 endowment, even if miselling was proved, whether you would be due any compensation to put you in the same place as you would have been with a repayment.

    Note that FP are one of the LifeCos who have voluntarily agreed to hear pre-1988 misselling cases.
    illegitimi non carborundum
  • mystic_trev
    mystic_trev Posts: 5,434 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Editor wrote:
    Of course the poster will have had a demutualisation bonus, which is more than the poor people at RSA can say

    I've got an RSA Endowment (old Royal Life Policy) taken out late 1982. Hard to believe, but it's still on target, and even looks like having a surplus!
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,122 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I've got an RSA Endowment (old Royal Life Policy) taken out late 1982. Hard to believe, but it's still on target, and even looks like having a surplus!

    Not hard to believe at all. LAPR applied to your policy and its long term. Endowments of 25 years currently maturing are generally still paying out surpluses.

    Although many endowment policies invest in areas with little potential for growth and some action is required to sort those out, the projection method used to show shortfalls is flawed.

    Endowments have always grown on a curve basis but the projection method assumes straight line. A product which has front loaded charges is never going to show "on track" in the early years. Even if it is the best endowment in the world. Add in the fact that terminal bonuses are not allowed to be included (or any other additional bonus), leaving only the annual bonuses, and this means people could be surrendering perfectly good endowments (as has been the case).
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    The last Money Management survey on endowments six months ago showed RSA 25 yr endowments maturing with a 28% Terminal bonus, 20 yrs with 13%, 15 years with 5% and 10 years with nil. The trend is pretty clear, sadly :(

    Just for interest, the comparison with Standard Life was:
    25 years 37%, 20 years 17%, 15 years 4%, 10 years nil.

    These figures (which date from Aug 2004)are already much lower but at that point even with the cuts, Standard Life was still ahead of the Pru on the older policies

    Pru figures
    25 years 31%, 20 years 17%, 15 years 17%, 10 years 8.5%.

    And for the OP

    Friends Provident

    25 years 26%
    20 years 9%
    15 years 9%
    10 years nil

    Pretty dire a year ago, probably worse now :(
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.