We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Do you want house price to rise or fall?
Options
Comments
-
MobileSaver wrote: »Yes, often discussed and every time it's debunked.
An odd thing to say considering this is the Debate House Prices section of the forum.
Around 100,000 properties are bought and sold every month and that's been consistent for years so please clarify what the "problem" is that I'm dismissing...
Bit of a delayed reply, sorry!
I'm well aware that plenty of people buy houses. Clearly that is the case or prices wouldn't be so high! The problem/crisis/call it what you like is the inequality. What I mean by this not being the place to discuss it is that people here are biased towards looking after their own finances rather than caring about the state of the country as a whole.
I actually don't think the problem is house prices. There is no reason why those on low wages should be able to afford to buy. But they should be able to rent at a much lower rate and have more stability.0 -
I also don't think you can just look at national figures, and just figures alone. There are regional and socio-economic issues you fail to take into account.0
-
But they should be able to rent at a much lower rate and have more stability.
What do you mean by "much lower rate" & "more stability"?
If you mean that you shouldn't be able to ask them to leave or put the rent up, then buyers would end up subsidising them & why should we? If I was renting my house then I'd be complaining to the land lord about all the work that needs doing. I'll do it to my house when I can afford it, how would it be sustainable if renters can get a better deal for less.0 -
What do you mean by "much lower rate" & "more stability"?
If you mean that you shouldn't be able to ask them to leave or put the rent up, then buyers would end up subsidising them & why should we? If I was renting my house then I'd be complaining to the land lord about all the work that needs doing. I'll do it to my house when I can afford it, how would it be sustainable if renters can get a better deal for less.
I think the current legislation favours tenants
E.g. it take a landlord months to get a court case heard if they need to evict someone and even councils advise people not to make themselves intentionally homeless.
I’m a homeowner and tenant btw.
If people want security of tenure then they should do something about their circs - second/third job, move so you can buy rather than moan ts not a plate for them in their chosen location.
Harsh but fair.0 -
Just a simple poll to see what MSE members want.
PS: Please assume rise means a value higher than inflation and similarly, fall means value lower than inflation adjusted figures.
Alaternatively, you can also consider
rise = average house price / average income => ratio going up
fall = average house price / average income => ratio going down
Anybody who owns a house wants to see it rise in value, but after two great decades 2019 is going to be a little rest period, might even see some very slight falls in value. But I predict for 2020 it will be full steam ahead again, don't get caught out again you doom mongers.0 -
Not true if you read my previous post. I am a home owner and I would be quite happy to see the prices of property fall.0
-
As a first time buyer, fall crash and burn!0
-
I selfishly want my property value to increase so when I come to remortgage my LTV falls in to the lowest bracket. However, I don't believe out of control property prices are a good thing, and I think we need to see a period of stability i.e. no rise/fall, so that earnings can catch up.
I don't see a massive house price crash as being good for anyone. Owners will be less likely to sell due to negative equity, reduced equity affecting onward purchase (such as higher LTV), unaffordability due to change in circumstances etc. The property market doesn't work like the whoopsie aisle in ASDA, the properties don't HAVE to be sold. The only exception will be reposessions and auctions, and they exist today, no crash needed.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards