We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Emerging Markets funds
Comments
-
bostonerimus wrote: »I'd go for a low cost EM tracker if I was going to overweight this sector, but I don't bother as my EM investment comes from a cap weighted global ex USA tracker fund. As the EM market cap grows/falls so will my investment in it.
Personally I prefer investments to be screened in such markets. Simply buying a share because investors have chased the price skywards. Isn't palatable currently. India and Asia are not as mature as the US markets for example. Not as well researched. Nor is Corporate governance etc at the same level. I'd prefer local investment managers monitoring the holdings.0 -
I use an EM tracker. Not everyone!!!8217;s cup of tea I know but I was more concerned with picking a dog than with out performance.0
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Personally I prefer investments to be screened in such markets. Simply buying a share because investors have chased the price skywards. Isn't palatable currently. India and Asia are not as mature as the US markets for example. Not as well researched. Nor is Corporate governance etc at the same level. I'd prefer local investment managers monitoring the holdings.
This is why I don't overweight EM in my portfolio.“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”0 -
Interesting discussion.
On you tube there are some really interesting debate videos in favour and against managed and active funds.0 -
Interesting discussion.
On you tube there are some really interesting debate videos in favour and against managed and active funds.
There is an endless debate about this, I just wanted to point out that to say:
is factually wrong.emerging markets are universally agreed to be better catered for by managed funds0 -
What percentage of a portfolio invested in EM funds is classed as overweight?bostonerimus wrote: »This is why I don't overweight EM in my portfolio.0 -
The important thing with Emerging Market funds is not what they did last year.
And periodically, it tends to do so with emerging market funds. You are looking at 90% loss potential.
Nonsense! Maybe if you invest solely in one small emerging market, say Bolivia or Cambodia, but if you stick to a single region (Latin America, Far East, Africa etc) or even better find a fund that covers a range of emerging markets (maybe the BRICS+, or BICS of you think Russia stinks) you have a natural hedge against turbulence or political risk in any one market.0 -
Unless you're willing to invest in individual companies from China, Russia, Latin America or India that have US or London stock market listings you will need a degree of good local knowledge and information as many of the companies in these markets aren't well researched or reported on and will not have to comply with very strict reporting requirements as those needed to list in London or New York. I would opt for funds specialising in the regions but would go a step further and go for a fund that has an additional level of due dilligence such as an ethical fund manager such as Alquity. An ethical and managed approach to investment in such regions significantly reduces company-risk and political risk in each individual investment made by portfolio managers.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards