Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Nationwide up 0.6%

Up 0.6% and back over 3% year on year:)

Even I thought we might level off for the first part of 2018, this is why I am fighingt to convince people that prices are affordable because of the simple fact people are willing to pay for the new highs, not rocket science.
«1

Comments

  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    More importantly the annual rise is 3.2%. Here is a link: https://www.nationwide.co.uk/-/media/MainSite/documents/about/house-price-index/2018/Jan_2018.pdf

    Although London is having a tougher time, but the outlook is not too bad:

    http://www.cityam.com/279691/sorry-homeowners-london-now-officially-buyers-market

    We are forecasting that prices in London only increase by a net figure of seven per cent over the next five years, whereas in the UK we think it is going to be twice that figure, at 14.2 per cent, he told City A.M.

    I would certainly take 7% over the next 5 years, at which point I will have sold another 2 investment properties, I'm happy with the gains that I have made and I'll settle for banking those.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • 7% over five years sounds like a real-terms decline. What a pity for net buyers that punitive stamp duty means the actual cost of buying will still be higher.
  • Badegg
    Badegg Posts: 29 Forumite
    7% over five years sounds like a real-terms decline. What a pity for net buyers that punitive stamp duty means the actual cost of buying will still be higher.

    but for those who simply want to buy a long term residential property....its still better to buy now essentially. the "decline" in price would only be a positive gain for them if they invested in other assets which out performed and then provided them with a bigger deposit / if their increased salary in 5 years allowed for bigger mortgage?

    im really keen to buy soon but at same time loath the idea of prices crashing and parents constantly going "told you so, why didnt you just continue living rent free with us?" (yes, opposite of english parents and WANT kids to stay with them forever :rotfl:)
  • If you hold off buying in fear of prices crashing, you'll never buy. We have a regular on this board who has been thinking this way since 1996. In the 22 years he's been waiting for house prices to crash, they have actually quadrupled. He now needs prices to fall by 130% in order for his decision to sell up and wait for a crash in 1996 to pay off. Crashes of more than 100% are, of course, fairly unusual.

    Waiting for a crash is property speculation, pure and simple. It's just being a spec short rather than a spec long.
  • Badegg
    Badegg Posts: 29 Forumite
    If you hold off buying in fear of prices crashing, you'll never buy. We have a regular on this board who has been thinking this way since 1996. In the 22 years he's been waiting for house prices to crash, they have actually quadrupled. He now needs prices to fall by 130% in order for his decision to sell up and wait for a crash in 1996 to pay off. Crashes of more than 100% are, of course, fairly unusual.

    Waiting for a crash is property speculation, pure and simple. It's just being a spec short rather than a spec long.

    yeah thats my fear too. my salary could rise at 3-5% a year but if house prices only rise 2-3% im not sure thats a tread id rather do in 5 years. tbh im not hoping / expecting a 50% crash. more like 5-10% probably. lots of houses i see are already on the market for ~9 months + and reduced 10-15%. Just seems like they could do with another 5-10%. could always put in the cheeky offer and see what happens i guess.

    and yes! i already recognise Crashy Times posts without having to check username!
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Badegg wrote: »
    im really keen to buy soon but at same time loath the idea of prices crashing and parents constantly going "told you so, why didnt you just continue living rent free with us?"

    As you'll have moved out and won't have to listen to such silliness, what does it matter?

    You could point out that as you bought the property to live in and have no intention of selling it, and if you did it would only be to buy another house which has also crashed in value, the crash in prices is irrelevant to you. Or you could just put the phone down.

    If you own your own home and the only reason you would sell it is to move, you would want house prices to crash. Firstly, when people change houses, up until retirement age it's usually for a bigger and more expensive one. This means that house price crashes are good for you as it narrows the gap. If you own a house worth £250k and you want to move to one worth £500k, you have to find £250k from your own resources or a mortgage lender. If both your houses crash by 50% you now only have to find £125k from your own resources.

    Secondly, a crash in house prices means you pay less stamp duty. So even if you wanted to move from a £250k home to another £250k home, a general 50% crash is good for you as you are now in exactly the same position only you don't have to pay £2,500 in stamp duty.

    Of course it is not quite as simple as that. In reality, if house prices crashed, you probably wouldn't be able to move as the guy with the £500k house wouldn't sell until prices recovered. However, it illustrates that the potential for a house price crash has absolutely no relevance to the decision to buy a home to live in. Only on buying a house as an investment.

    Only people who may want to downsize (which is very few of them) and people who own property as an investment need to fear house price crashes.
  • Badegg
    Badegg Posts: 29 Forumite
    If you hold off buying in fear of prices crashing, you'll never buy. We have a regular on this board who has been thinking this way since 1996. In the 22 years he's been waiting for house prices to crash, they have actually quadrupled. He now needs prices to fall by 130% in order for his decision to sell up and wait for a crash in 1996 to pay off. Crashes of more than 100% are, of course, fairly unusual.

    Waiting for a crash is property speculation, pure and simple. It's just being a spec short rather than a spec long.
    Malthusian wrote: »
    As you'll have moved out and won't have to listen to such silliness, what does it matter?

    You could point out that as you bought the property to live in and have no intention of selling it, and if you did it would only be to buy another house which has also crashed in value, the crash in prices is irrelevant to you. Or you could just put the phone down.

    If you own your own home and the only reason you would sell it is to move, you would want house prices to crash. Firstly, when people change houses, up until retirement age it's usually for a bigger and more expensive one. This means that house price crashes are good for you as it narrows the gap. If you own a house worth £250k and you want to move to one worth £500k, you have to find £250k from your own resources or a mortgage lender. If both your houses crash by 50% you now only have to find £125k from your own resources.

    Secondly, a crash in house prices means you pay less stamp duty. So even if you wanted to move from a £250k home to another £250k home, a general 50% crash is good for you as you are now in exactly the same position only you don't have to pay £2,500 in stamp duty.

    Of course it is not quite as simple as that. In reality, if house prices crashed, you probably wouldn't be able to move as the guy with the £500k house wouldn't sell until prices recovered. However, it illustrates that the potential for a house price crash has absolutely no relevance to the decision to buy a home to live in. Only on buying a house as an investment.

    Only people who may want to downsize (which is very few of them) and people who own property as an investment need to fear house price crashes.

    well sad thing is is that if i move my parent will probably follow me and live in my apartment whilst renting out our old house :rotfl:

    but good points. its like i tell my friend whos invested in crypto - you're only making a loss during a price crash if you sell!

    tbh doubt we will be downsizing / selling. after i buy the apartment our family (between myself / parents) will own 2 flats & a house. after that ill focus on repaying the mortgage & diversifying into other investments. the flats will then probably eventually end up as something for my kids in future ideally.
  • _CC_
    _CC_ Posts: 362 Forumite
    Badegg wrote: »
    my salary could rise at 3-5% a year but if house prices only rise 2-3% im not sure thats a tread id rather do in 5 years.

    A 5% pay rise on a £25,000 salary = £1,250

    A 3% increase on a £200,000 house = £6,000

    ~5 x greater
  • Badegg
    Badegg Posts: 29 Forumite
    _CC_ wrote: »
    A 5% pay rise on a £25,000 salary = £1,250

    A 3% increase on a £200,000 house = £6,000

    ~5 x greater

    and sadly unless there are multiple job movements (since thats what gets you the biggest increase) its more likely to be 2.5% increase in salary & 1-2% increase in house prices (in e.g. a stagnant london) so even worse.
  • katebl
    katebl Posts: 637 Forumite
    triathlon wrote: »
    Up 0.6% and back over 3% year on year:)

    Even I thought we might level off for the first part of 2018, this is why I am fighingt to convince people that prices are affordable because of the simple fact people are willing to pay for the new highs, not rocket science.

    Funny you and Greatape have the same personal crusade there... Both seriously unconvincing too
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.