📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Hargreaves Lansdown stops taking money on 1,500 funds. Affects other brokers too.

This started happening 2 weeks ago but I've only just heard about it.

Hargreaves Lansdown is preventing customers investing in 1,500 funds because they have failed to meet new European Union rules on Key Information Documents (KID).

Other brokers have started taking similar action.

https://www.reuters.com/article/europe-funds-platforms-suspension/uk-investment-platforms-suspend-some-funds-for-failing-to-meet-new-eu-rules-idUSL8N1OZ1L8

Comments

  • HappyHarry
    HappyHarry Posts: 1,835 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Welcome to Mifid II, which came into place on 3rd January.

    The transparency requirements for charging have changed significantly, and many fund providers have not yet got their systems in a position where the charging details are as transparent as they need to be. Many fund providers have a short-term permission to carry on as before whilst their systems are updated, but it seems HL are simplifying what they need to do by simply refusing to purchase funds from those fund providers who are not yet compliant with Mifid II.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser. Any comments I make here are intended for information / discussion only. Nothing I post here should be construed as advice. If you are looking for individual financial advice, please contact a local Independent Financial Adviser.
  • sorcerer
    sorcerer Posts: 878 Forumite
    A large number of these stocks, have now produced their KIDs, so I think most will be back and available to trade.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,953 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The FCA has already said it sees 2018 as a bedding in year and would not penalise those who could not be fully compliant on 3rd Jan as long as the firms were moving towards being compliant.

    I suppose you have two points of view here. A firm that wants to be 100% compliant as soon as possible or one that wants to be as close as possible to full compliance but willing whilst having flexibility to give other firms a chance to get there.

    Personally, I can understand them immediately blocking US domiciled ETFs/ITs as you know that compliance is unlikely. It's not a case of delay but just not going to happen with most. But cancelling ones you know are coming is harsh at this stage.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.