We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Lost job due to incorrect reference
Comments
-
Big difference between an error when they said you had 33 days off sick in the last year when it is a typo and it was only 3 and a disagreement with the employer saying that in their opinion, they felt you were slow at finishing tasks when you think you are super fast.0
-
As others have said, opinion is permissible. So you would need to show that there was a falsehood. But frankly, I have to agree with the "there more to this" line. Most employers don't give a "bad" reference, even if you are the most mediocre of employees. It's too much hassle. Let someone else figure it out would be their attitude. In fact, I know of glowing references given to the worst of employees to get shut of them!
So you need to say what is really going on here.0 -
Thanks for all your responses.
Is anyone who has commented a specialist in Employment Law?0 -
-
-
And how would you know the answer is true?Thanks for all your responses.
Is anyone who has commented a specialist in Employment Law?
As others have said, if you want certainty (whatever that is, given some of the lousy advice we have seen given to people by "professionals") then there is a price tag attached to it.0 -
If you were in a union, you could get some advice that way.Signature removed for peace of mind0
-
-
I think you will just have to chalk this up to experience and move on. you know not to use this company as a reference again.
If you try to take legal action then you set to lose more than you will gain as you will need to prove the reference is factually incorrect, either intentionally or by human error.
good luckJust a single mum, working full time, bit of a nutcase, but mostly sensible, wanting to be Mortgage free by 2035 or less! £196,000/£177560 to go0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

