We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
First time buyer - remortgage question

Blimsters
Posts: 8 Forumite

Hi
I've just started saving from scratch to buy my first home, and I am aiming to save a 10% deposit. My preference though would be to be able to buy a house as soon as possible, as I am currently indefinitely lodging with a friend and it's not an ideal medium-term solution. I understand that a 5% deposit would leave me with a significantly lower rate than a 10% deposit, but another option I am considering is to take out a 95% mortgage on say a 2 year fixed rate, and then during those two years save the additional 5% and remortgage on what would effectively be a 10% deposit.
I realise that I would be paying more during the first two years than I would be if I had then 10%, but my questions are:
(a) Does this make sense/is it actually possible?
(b) Are there any other significant financial disadvantages, other than paying a bit of a higher rate?
The other factor in my consideration is the potential increase in house prices while I continue to save the additional 5%, and that this could effectively cancel out the higher payments I'd be making if I bought earlier.
I'm very new to this, so any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
I've just started saving from scratch to buy my first home, and I am aiming to save a 10% deposit. My preference though would be to be able to buy a house as soon as possible, as I am currently indefinitely lodging with a friend and it's not an ideal medium-term solution. I understand that a 5% deposit would leave me with a significantly lower rate than a 10% deposit, but another option I am considering is to take out a 95% mortgage on say a 2 year fixed rate, and then during those two years save the additional 5% and remortgage on what would effectively be a 10% deposit.
I realise that I would be paying more during the first two years than I would be if I had then 10%, but my questions are:
(a) Does this make sense/is it actually possible?
(b) Are there any other significant financial disadvantages, other than paying a bit of a higher rate?
The other factor in my consideration is the potential increase in house prices while I continue to save the additional 5%, and that this could effectively cancel out the higher payments I'd be making if I bought earlier.
I'm very new to this, so any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
0
Comments
-
Check the rates of 95% and 90% mortgages and how much extra it will cost. Full rate on 5% + the difference on 90%
then think about how much prices could go up or down in the time it takes to save another 5%
on £100k over a year with say 4% and 3.5% the extra is £200+£450 a year or a 0.65% price rise.0 -
I guess the main disadvantage would be that if prices did fall in that 2 year period you could be at greater risk of being in negative equity. Coupled with a rise in interest rates - this could leave you in vulnerable position financially.Homeowner:j0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards