Possible disciplinary

sharpe106

Both parties are just as guilty as both knew the rules but ignored them. Obviously the money side is important to the company but if it was me I would be more worried that I could not trust either parties and would be looking at getting rid of both, if they are bending that rule what other rules are they bending that I am unaware off.

Alfrescodave

How were you originally told about the maximum number of items that could be bought? Was it in a written form such as contract of employment or verbally from a manger?
Is it visibly displayed in the shop?

Has this overbuying happened once or many times.

viksviks84

Bearing in mind 50% of the workforce were buying too many. They would have to get rid of everyone wouldn't they?

It's very interesting getting different points of view

viksviks84

Alfrescodave wrote: »

How were you originally told about the maximum number of items that could be bought? Was it in a written form such as contract of employment or verbally from a manger?
Is it visibly displayed in the shop?

Has this overbuying happened once or many times.

The official 2 bag limit was in writing, the staff shop employees told us 4 bags (verbally). There is nothing in my contract about the staff shop, it's just a perk.

Only a few times did I buy more than 4 bags. I was remiss and complacement and I'm very sorry. I Would certainly have put them back if asked, as mentioned it was only for family to save them money.

Comms69

viksviks84 wrote: »

Bearing in mind 50% of the workforce were buying too many. They would have to get rid of everyone wouldn't they?

It's very interesting getting different points of view

No.


They can choose when to enforce and when not to


So they could keep Bob, Joe and Craig and sack you.


Or keep you and sack Joe. Or whatever

McKneff

When you go into your meeting, dont keep repeating they were family, you are doing that on here and it really is irrelevant.

viksviks84

McKneff wrote: »

When you go into your meeting, dont keep repeating they were family, you are doing that on here and it really is irrelevant.

Okay thank you

pramsay13

What is the reason for the 2 bag limit?

sharpe106

viksviks84 wrote: »

Bearing in mind 50% of the workforce were buying too many. They would have to get rid of everyone wouldn't they?

It's very interesting getting different points of view

Two wrongs do not make a right. T

They might not have evidence of others doing wrong. It is often the case that one person gets punished for what others also do but they are the unlucky one to get caught and they can use that as a warning to others.

viksviks84

pramsay13 wrote: »

What is the reason for the 2 bag limit?

No idea! It's just always been until the shop people said 4 bags, I know now that they shouldn't have said that.