We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Splitting up with girlfriend - Advice Needed

2

Comments

  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,994 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    PS This is the first time I've posted on this forum so apologies if I have done something wrong.

    Excellent first post, both for advice, opinions and a discussion!

    The only improvement would be supplying a magnifying glass ;)
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    silvercar wrote: »
    Initial mortgage payments do little more than cover interest.

    It is an interesting quandry, somehow the fact that you have been paying the mortgage for 44 months needs to be taken into account eg if you had been paying the mortgage for only 4 months or 240 months the calculation should stand the scrutiny.

    I suspect there would be a time when the mortgage payments exceed the equity in the house, exposing a flaw in your calculations.

    ----

    Also, if the property had been bought in your ex's sole name, with her deposit and her you paying some rent/ keep/ contribution to household costs would that have left you with an entitlement to anything?

    You ignore the mortgage payments just use the equity that debt bought(50%) less any outstanding mortgage.

    It really is that simple
  • gycraig_2
    gycraig_2 Posts: 533 Forumite
    I'd just split the value gain 50-50 and get back all mortgage payments and call it a day. Op was mortgaging his half basically.
  • Suarez
    Suarez Posts: 970 Forumite
    If anything, your ex's large deposit gave you a very good LTV which no doubt gave you a very good interest rate on the mortgage but probably best no to go into that :)
  • Haha! Sorry I didn't realise text was so small as I just used the default size. Thank you for all (or nearly all) the helpful suggestions. Just to clarify, the house is in my name too so I’m definitely entitled to something. I’m just trying to find a fair and amicable way to get my part of the investment back. I have had several chats with my ex about this and we both agreed that it’d be best to stay amicable as we have a son together but as I said on my original post, I know that things can go from amicable to hostile in a nanosecond when there’s money involved so I just want to protect myself and make sure I don’t get screwed over. Thanks again!
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    If the intention is a complete financial separation re the house the biggest stumbling block may be the mortgage if the value has gone up a lot.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    davids1982 wrote: »
    Haha! Sorry I didn't realise text was so small as I just used the default size. Thank you for all (or nearly all) the helpful suggestions. Just to clarify, the house is in my name too so I’m definitely entitled to something. I’m just trying to find a fair and amicable way to get my part of the investment back. I have had several chats with my ex about this and we both agreed that it’d be best to stay amicable as we have a son together but as I said on my original post, I know that things can go from amicable to hostile in a nanosecond when there’s money involved so I just want[/COLOR] to protect myself and make sure I don’t get screwed over. Thanks again!

    What is fair.

    Well she put in 50% and hasn't paid any of your mortgage payments, correct?

    You have paid in 50% with the help of a mortgage. Only you have been paying the mortgage, as that is how you got 50% of the property.

    Therefore you both have put in 50% (her via cash, you via a loan). You are both entitled to 50% of the value/sell price.

    As getmore4less has pointed out, you will be requiring a much larger mortgage so you should make sure you can afford it before going down this route.
  • lspell1
    lspell1 Posts: 75 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Your due half the value less the outstanding mortgage.

    It's that simple unless you messed up the deed in some way.

    Your payments are not relevant as they serviced the debt you used to buy your half.

    How would that possibly be fair to the person that has put down a £105,000 deposit??
    I assume the mortgage is in Joint names. The OP's partner should remortgage (transfer of equity) the property and raise the relevant equity mentioned above to pay off their partner.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    lspell1 wrote: »
    How would that possibly be fair to the person that has put down a £105,000 deposit??
    I assume the mortgage is in Joint names. The OP's partner should remortgage (transfer of equity) the property and raise the relevant equity mentioned above to pay off their partner.

    They have only bought and paid for 1/2 the house if they want to buy the other 1/2 now they need to find the new value of 1/2 the house.
    They have not paid towards the mortgage so that does not count as part of their share, that was the other persons share.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Suarez wrote: »
    If anything, your ex's large deposit gave you a very good LTV which no doubt gave you a very good interest rate on the mortgage but probably best no to go into that :)
    You could adjust for that wouldn't be too hard.

    There is also a kid involved to complicate.

    Starting point is 1/2 the value less the mortgage for the OH to bu y them out.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.